If someone verbalized their consent while drunk, they weren't too drunk to consent, and they consented to the sex; there would be no rape and no trial.

That's false. You can give consent while intoxicated. Stop spreading that ignorant myth. Legal contracts (civil law) are not relevant to criminal law.

It happens all the time. I've seen enough feminists post that kinda stuff, and it's even made its way into public policy. Now a man has to have explicit "consent" at every point of sex. Feminists constantly push the notion that a man having sex with a drunk woman is "taking advantage" of her and equate it to rape.…

Actually you have it backwards. Women that have sex with men while drunk, and later claim they were raped, put the accused on the defensive. They force the other person to prove they didn't rape them, when the burden to prove guilt is on the accuser. Women often get a cop out for having drunk sex.

Yet here we see a…

Fuck off you pompous asshole. Hunting and shooting are a sport safely enjoyed by millions of youth in America. It is no different than wanting a picture in your football uniform or in front of the car you restored. Hell, statistically hunting is safer than almost every other sport.

Shame on the lawyers? They're just doing their jobs.

The most commonly relied on rape statistics label it as such. I'll attach the jezebel article which talks about the CDC study about 1 in 5 women being raped. The study includes rape as any form of penetration that involved alcohol or drugs. The survey pretty much labels any sex after a romantic dinner under the…

That logic breaks down very quickly in this particular case because the defendant had enough presence of mind to cover up a security camera AND take video footage of the crime.

As a personal anecdote, I was at a party and there was a girl that I knew well for a long time who was pretty cool, but that I was massively unattracted to despite her many advances, and getting all mad & depressed every time I refused (this was semi-frequent). Many drinks later, I wake up on the floor and this woman…

What I meant is that it seems that if both parties are drunk, only the woman is considered a candidate for rape under the current proposed reforms.

Better question:

if a dude is too drunk and rapes he was too drunk to know what he's doing

I came here thinking maybe both of them had been equally drunk, and it would have been a complicated "her experience is valid, but so is his" deal, but, nope. Too drunk to notice she's too drunk to be doing anything? Believable. Too drunk to think gang-raping a girl and filming it is wrong? Nope nope nope nope nope.

I was going to say she'd have been a better thief if only she'd stayed at the Holiday Inn Express...

There are alternatives, ya know...

Biological clock upgrade!

A good way to snatch items.

Erm, he is covered by US law as he is in the custody of the US. And if you weren't busy wiping your ass with nation's laws, you'd know that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights does not apply to citizens exclusively.

And considering that people have been "detained" at GITMO for 14+ years with no charge whatsoever,…

I kind of agree? He shouldn't have to be touched by female guards if he doesn't want to and it's against his religion....

Betty Ford was still way more a feminist than this ideological trainwreck up in here. Sure, she was high most of the time, but she still did a lot of righteous.