Call it what you will, it really isn't that much more than you were doing anyway. It's pretty hard for me to get too worked about "rape" in this kind of scenario, sorry, partly because it isn't THAT easy to put it in a virginal 16 year old to begin with. What were you doing while he was "putting it in?"

She sees the mixed signals, I see the mixed signals, you don't.

Women pretty much have a lock on playing this game, yes.

Everyone is a troll to you. Give it a rest.

Enough women do play these coy, hard to get games. You know that as well as I do.

Am I dealing with women here? Who knew?

So touching, not to mention clueless.

So you're 16 and you have a foul mouth. Any other redeeming qualities?

I'm sure yours are thrilled with you too.

Already do have daughters, dear.

Might be worthwhile to charge a few million women like this to get the whole concept back on track.

And you missed the point.

Are you going to be as childish as the rest of the feminists around here?

I don't disagree that it sounds like rape. That wasn't the point.

No thank you, I prefer on.

You didn't invalidate, you supplemented the data.

There were mixed signals. You claim there weren't, but that doesn't make what I see as being any less true, and this is from her side of the story. That doesn't absolve the other person of anything wrong that may have happened.

But not saying "no" isn't the new standard for feminists. One must say yes, and I wasn't given the opportunity of saying either way before I was in her vagina.

And this story, sad as it is, has what to do with the statistics? And the claim that even more than the number in the study have been raped?

Clearly you're trolling is such the whiny feminist response to every comment they don't like so stuff it.