efcdons
efcdons
efcdons

That’s cool how she is calling some feminists of color basically self hating and marginalizing their voices. Who knew someone like Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie is actually a white supremacist? That tweet is definitely the work of an ally of WoC who cares deeply about their opinions and lived experience.

In of how their thinking mirrors one another, it can be remarkably difficult to distinguish between the talking points of the libertarian right and the language of third wave feminists on issues like trans rights, prostitution, pornography, etc. Does that make that type of individualist feminism the baddies too?

The fact some percentage of women don’t have a uterus or are infertile for other reasons doesn’t negate the claim that women in general have a greater understanding of the need for choice as public policy and will suffer the most when reproductive rights are rolled back. It’s a bit strange that in order to support

I don’t know if there is any systemic study. Considering how relatively few transwomen there are compared to natal women it’s unlikely transwomen are taking over the world. But there are plenty of anecdotes. For example, transwomen being given positions which were initially designed to advocate for women. Like Lily

Libertarians who hate poor people, want to destroy the welfare state, want to tie voting to property ownership and other terrible right wing things also believe pornography is totally cool, people should be allowed to be a prostitute if they want, and anyone can identify as anything they like as long as it doesn’t

Hey now, Joe Biden understands poor people “abuse” the bankruptcy system by partying it up buying things like medical care and food then laughing all the way to bankruptcy court at how they got away with screwing humble, naive banks. That’s why he Pragmatically and very Adult like worked hard with republicans to pass

What is it about republicans and complaining about people talk too much about what the party does? Racism, hurting poor people, destroying the environment, hurting workers, hurting consumers, the list goes on. Are you saying if the Democratic party stopped saying anything about it republicans will stop doing it?

It’s kind of not the point at all because absolutely no one is making that argument. Because it would be obviously stupid.

Do you think “sex testing” and concerns about differences in sexual development giving some athletes competing in the “female” category in athletics were just invented to take down Semenya?

This type of “sex testing” originated due to concerns with eastern bloc athletes in the 60s. Who were all white. The first woman prevented from competing with other women due to a chromosome test was a white Spanish hurdler. The connection to race is only due to the fact in developed countries the conditions at issue

They probably know it. And they probably know the history of “sex testing” in athletes was historically centered on white athletes from developed countries when the current medical intervention was not as widely available so these types of conditions would still show up among adult athletes in the “global north”.

“I guess it should not be surprising that attempts to scientifically or empirically define the physiological limits of a social construct have led to this absurd situation.”

She isn’t Michael Phelps or Usain Bolt because she is competing in the “female” category of her events. That is the “restricted” category. Phelps and Bolt competed in the “open” category. I’m not getting why people are seem to be purposefully ignoring the reason for why we have male and female categories for athletic

The womens’ 800m world record was run by a Czech athlete in 1983 who was presumed to have been heavily doping. Like a lot of eastern bloc athletes of that era. Semenya’s inability to break that record isn’t proof the advantage she gains from her condition are minor. When Semenya did previously run with her

And if she wants to run in the “male” category then her “built in chemical performance enhancer” is a non-issue. Because the male category is the “open”, “unrestricted” category. The problem is she wants to run in the female category which comes with certain restrictions beyond just how one chooses to self-identify.

The people here arguing against the Cas ruling are mixing together gender and sex in order to make Cas look unreasonable. Because many commentators in the media are using words like “woman” and “female” interchangeably, I don’t entirely blame someone who thinks the two concepts are essentially the same thing and both

This case has nothing to do with Semenya being a WoC other than being from a developing country, she was not able to have certain medical interventions early in life which may have changed how her body produces which hormones in what amounts.

The “female” category in athletic competition isn’t for people who identify with a particular gender. It was created to ensure female athletes had a place where they could be competitive, elite athletes. Because of differences between male and female bodies which give men an overwhelming competitive advantage at the

The “sex testing” regime was created in the ‘60s in response to concerns about eastern bloc athletes. The first person prevented from competing in an international competition because of the results of a chromosomal test was a Spanish hurdler in the ‘80s. All white people. This NYT Sunday Magazine article on sex

Why even have a primary? We should just declare Biden the candidate and avoid the circular firing squad of talking about policy positions and actions someone took while involved in government or leading powerful senate committees. The only legitimate topic of conversation during primary season is apparently “just