eebrenner-old
eebrenner
eebrenner-old

@tomsomething: You do realize that a single symptom could lead to millions of different things?

@tomsomething: A chemical imbalance is not a disease. A brain defect, is not a disease. My point was not the kidneys. My point was the individual not drinking h2O. Although consuming beverages...they had caffeine which nulls the H2O in them. Therefore, he is providing his dehydration whether he is aware of it or

@rick23: All I have done is apply logic, science and statistics. I am an electrical engineer, that is all I know.

@tomsomething: I never said you werent allowed to take pills.

@rick23: The world is not as it seems. Reality is full of distort.

@rick23: On a more serious scenario, I'll ask you this.

@eebrenner: Hence why it is a deficiency, not a disease. They have no one to blame but themselves.

@seanpat12: WiMax would require the same amount of revision as an LTE revision...Which I agree...doesnt sound that major to add an antenna and chipset. Except the design and implications of adding such features would result in a lot of testing, degradation of battery performance and other things. If they werent

@tomsomething: Physical diseases are...real? I dont think you will use"lactose intolerant" as a scapegoat for many things except eating toecheese.

@Criosphynx: i just know that some people only look at pictures and read the headline. Then full-heartedly believe their outlandish ideas.

@Dr. Evil Genius: Cold as Winter: Take a daily vitamin, year round. There, no vitamin deficiency. You need 5 to 30 min exposure of UVB to your face and legs...twice a week to produce the necessary amounts of vit D. Even though its cloudy...there is plenty of UVB out there. All you have to do is walk outside...UVA

@tomsomething: We are all unique...Simple brain inadequacies and differences make us unique. Instead people search for a common issue to finding a reason on why they are different.

@Ricorich196: WiMax infrastructure is way to young to merge.

@dutchbillza: Personal Beliefs. A lot of 'diseases' are diseases based on studies, research, and exaggerations.

@Criosphynx: Did you read the article? It makes a pretty valid point on why it wont be an iphone.