Any grille that an don this is BADASS. But Seriously Aston Martin DB5

The best decals are the ones that mean there is something special under the hood.

It gets my vote.

Why are you hating on the rich guy? If you can't afford to hit a Ferrari don't drive like a jackass.

The boxer engine isn't news we knew about this about two years ago.

Really????? The badge in front makes it or breaks it for you? I think you would look as "retarded" in this car no matter what it's called. And I second Nieros...Who gives a shit about stereotypes or stigmas. Drive what you like.

"Let's just hope the inside isn't all plastic." What do you suggest they make it out of? Unicorn Farts?

The Hazard lights were on. "Safety First!!!!!!!!!"

Dude, I can't agree more. I don't visit Jalopnik much anymore. Every Starred commentor is a clone of the rest.

this can't be 30 year old Toyota. The AE86 started selling in '84 so at the most it's 27 years old.

Even better....Potenza RE-11. Checkout the latest comparo on Tirerack

I don't think it's star envy. Lately the only comments on Jalopnik are about how much Toyota sucks. Frankly it's getting kind of borring, and I don't come back as often as I used to.

Apparently for Germans "Planned Obsolescence" means that the electronic break down even before the warranty period is over. I don't know if the engineers at Bosh are idiots or the OEM's meddle and cost cut too much.

I've got a couple...CD Players/Cassette Players, Automatic seatbelts, Inner tubes, chokes, cigarette lighters....

Correction...New GM let it die in the Old GM.

88-89 Entra wto door.

You've been Assiomoed!

I support this comment.

The Tundra doesn't make any profits (it's a money looser for Toyota). So the profits go where? An if you're going to say the profits from the other cars they sell go to Japan...the profits (which for the auto industry are very low less than 5%) go to the shareholders, which could be anywhere including San Antonio USA.

all those provbably don't make one fact. Could it happen.... sure. Did it? The author showed no proof so you must give them the benefit of the doubt