I think you have captured the essence of not only the post-slap, but so many different issues. It’s incredibly difficult for people looking through one lens to see what people are seeing through another. And the lack of awareness of the other lenses exacerbates the tension.

This was a full journey, I commend  you for recognizing and adjusting.

I don’t love that the Phoenix Act is being called ERW’s “pet cause”.

This article resonates so much. My mom put me on Weight Watchers when I was nine, after many years of restricting what I could eat. The thing is, when I look back at childhood pictures, I was not fat. I wasn’t sinewy or lithe, but I was not fat. I was athletic. I played elite soccer from a very young age. I don’t…

I hear that. I also hate putting victims in the place of having to somehow prove they were victims. On the flip side, my personal motto in general is “I Believe Women”, plural. Otherwise it’s he said/she said.

We are once again asking you to not focus on our take on Armie Hammer from earlier this week

This week, on “Jezebel walks back its hot takes. . . ."

The tone of writing off Armie’s sexts as “Celebs, They’re Just Like Us!” really minimizes the fact that the women coming forward with these messages also assert that he also manipulated and abused them through these messages and their encounters. At one point he actually uses the word rape to describe a sexual…

I never got the macho men who ride Harleys with no helmet but their wives on the seat behind them almost always do. Nothing brings couples closer together like seeing one’s brains splattered over the pavement and you living to have that memory scarred real good. 

I think they want a cookie and a pat on the head for being good, and they want women to swoon “He’s sooooo sensitive, and dreamy”. I don’t think they actually give a shit about BEING good and really have not interest in putting in the work for it.

You know what’s good feminism? Not shitting on women for using their platform for good.

I fear the country is like the frog in the boiling pot of water. At this point we’re cooked but keep talking about being outraged with no actual repercussions except saying “we’ll vote him out!” and now he’s trying to close off that avenue.

What’s funny is that they even cite NAMI in the text of the article, which has the bizarre implication that this site (or this author, at least) thinks their research is credible, but not the recommendations for reporters that result from that research.

I feel like we’ve been trying to teach Jezebel staff this point for a decade now. They should have a fucking post-it note on the wall, at least.

Yes this needs a bump.  Starred.

Responding to bump this up ★

I scrolled down to comment to say the same thing. The headline was written by someone who didn't read the story, much less the Supreme Court's decision. 

The headline for this article seems wildly inaccurate to the point of irresponsibility, since the court’s opinion was not “DACA is here to stay,” but “you screwed up the paperwork when you tried to repeal it, go ahead and try again.”

I’ll let Chris Rock respond:

They were actually super helpful for a friend of mine when we were trying to get her help. I'm sorry you're experience wasn't the same. I agree they aren't always consistent or helpful, but sometimes they are.