eagleinthewindow
eagleinthewindow
eagleinthewindow

I've been in one non serious car accident. I've been mugged 5+ times. So there you go.

I'm a smug white person telling you that you're probably have internalized your victimhood to the point that you're are racist as the day is long.

Inflating a number of crimes by 36,000 is intellectual is it? Brave enough to tell me what your Phd is in? Applied mathematics ?

not 40,000. That's called lying and race baiting.

I have been and will be again. Living a nice all white suburb are we? Good for you. You have nothing to add. Or are you a smug non white talking about what you know not.

because the actions of one's ancestors obviously reflect on their descendants.

Hillary crosley coker, deleted everything I posted today. Oh well, maybe the NYT won't like being misquoted in hacky race bait. Maybe they are as bad.

not 40,000. Just as so long as it's the truth and not race baiting shit that translates to attacks on whites which are racially motivated, brutal and not uncommon.

then again, whites were victims of lynchings too. In fact Twain even mentions the white women who got tarred and feathered in Huckleberry Finn. But the white devil narrative still sells better. We like things simple and two sided.

That is what the title says. Not 40,000. I wonder if it's sue-able to misquote the new york times?

4000, not 40,000. Bit of a difference.

4000, not 40,000. Bit of a difference.

yeah, I posted this discrepancy as well, it disappeared, because I asked why white lynching victims were written out of history, as surely as the media has largely ignored the 70,000 whites slaughtered in their homes since apartheid ended in Africa. 4 times the population rate of homicide and classed by the UN as

The linked article actually says a bit less than 4000, not 40,000.

The linked article actually says a bit less than 4000, not 40,000.

The linked article actually says a bit less than 4000, not 40,000.

The linked article actually says a bit less than 4000, not 40,000.

The linked article actually says a bit less than 4000, not 40,000.

The linked article actually says a bit less than 4000, not 40,000.

The linked article actually says a bit less than 4000, not 40,000.