*Braindwidth robbery

Outside, and even inside of Africa, name one country where Jews are treated worse than blacks?

If what he said on the first episode was entirely pre-planned, he fooled me. He did discuss things he’s already publicly discussed, just in more detail here, but I thought his discussion opened up contributions from the guest stars who I haven’t heard speak so frankly before, such as OBJ, Candace Parker, and even…

What was the point of this article? 

If he misspeaks once it becomes a worldwide scandal that is discussed by ESPN until the end of time. Of course he is calculated in what he says... It doesn’t make any sense to me why that would devalue what he says though.

I’m just trying to figure out what the hell the point of any of this was. Of COURSE the show isn’t completely unedited/unfiltered/etc. This seems purely contrarian for contrarianism’s sake.

When you’re watching porn, especially one of those gauzy-lensed sensual ones, you generally do not find yourself thinking, Boy, that porn star fellow must be quite the gentleman at home.

I disagree with this article’s implicit premise that if Lebron is not offending viewers, he is not being fully truthful. Perhaps Lebron, like most people, doesn’t have that many hard-line positions on controversial topics.

Billy Haisley’s article “there is nothing candid about lebron’s the shop” is a candid look at what Billy Haisely thought of the new HBO show. However, the real purpose of the article is to make money.