Those are suggestions. Not evidence. If you wish to bail on your belongings you are free to do so; realistically you will never be in an airplane crash, so it’s odd you care so much.

His claims about what was seen on the factory floor had nothing to do with a piece of software and pilot training that he could not have seen on the factory floor.

You make a claim. You need to supply proof. Plenty of people have exited aircraft, luggage in hand, with no fatalities, so clearly getting luggage doesn’t cause fatalities.

“Please provide an example of this actually happening.”

Both crews failed to follow clear directions; in both they did the opposite of what the procedures called for. 

I wasn’t with the first crew either. The one that flew 90 minutes to a safe landing. Or the second crew, where the Captain was annoyed, but not panicked and handed off to his F/O who hadn’t had as many years of flying.

“could have” does a lot of heavy work there. Tell me you have video proof of the inside of an evacuation where any limiting was done by people taking belongings. You have proof, right? 

10,500 pounds is what a five foot cube of water weighs. Anything more is buoyancy. I’d estimate that a 5 X 5 X 5 cube could fit inside the airplane, even if one had to cut it into portions small enough to get through the door.

Instead of yanking and pulling, next time open the door and yell “FEEDING TIME” and step back to avoid getting trampled.

There’s no water in their station tanks, now. It’s been all pumped out into customer cars. See? Problem solved.

Read up on PIA 8303 and tell me you have belief that Airbus will always get you there. The same pilot skills brought you ET-302. 

Spirit was also spun off to give them a more stable manufacturing schedule. Inside of Boeing they had difficulty riding out the boom-bust of typical aircraft delivery. Separated, Spirit could and do supply Airbus with components.

Pierson is paid by a group that has latched onto Boeing like a lamprey looking for cash settlements after Ethiopian pilots mishandled a situation that, initially at Lion Air (the first 90 minute flight to safe landing), was No. Big. Deal. Read the FDR graphs in the final reports.

That is correct. The crabs that eat the flesh of giants.

If it was airtight it would not sink. 

If you squint you can just make out the tail has twin vertical stabilizers, one at each end of the horizontal stabilizer. There are very few planes like that and, as far as I know, no fighter airplanes with that configuration except the P-38, which has twin tail booms. 

Didn’t see any of my peeve and won’t be slideshowing - here it is.

This is not always true. It depends on what the seats, your clothing, and tires are made of. I had one car that would charge me up and deliver a big fat spark on most winter days. Get out - blammo. Get back in, get out - blammo again. Some high silica tires would build up a got blast just from rolling. 

Pulling it from the market would give the impression they agree that something is wrong and that admission would be very costly right now. If they can delay other legal action or drain their opponents dry in legal expenses, then that is a cost they will never see.