dwimby44
RumpleDickSkin
dwimby44

Disgusting, appalling, horrific, incomprehensible - whatever word I try to use to describe Tarantino’s asinine (there’s another one) statements just doesn’t do justice to how bad they are.

I get that Dodge was likely trying to broaden their consumer base with the ad, but with advertising the Ram pickups, they are likely only going to be able to gain sales from those that buy other trucks like Chevy, Ford, etc. The “Service” focus is a very narrow aspect of MLK Jr.’s focus and stated beliefs. For example

Violence is never the answer - ever. Except in this case.

How about focusing on the bullying that likely pushed this poor girl to do this, just like the kid in Kentucky. If the schools and parents are unwilling to do anything, what choice does a kid have? In their minds, it is either kill the bully (or bullies) or kill themselves. Sadly this is what they feel society has

I wish it just gave you a third option for details of what the updates are (without manually having to go into the App Store Updates area to see) so I know if I’m just updating some misc. apps or something bigger, like an OS update that will require reboot, 20 minutes, etc.

Ah, that’s a good one.

Illegal immigration.

The problem goes like this: blacks and hispanics are poorer than whites. Being poorer means more crime. More crime means law enforcement agencies, when deciding where and how to police, target blacks and hispanics, and places where more of those races live, for more policing. In turn, this means less policing for

One other person made a similar claim and I agree - the data can be biased for the very reasons you’ve stated, thus yielding an inaccurate or even inappropriate conclusion.  

Background checks and guns sales are related, but they are not interchangeable.

This is true.

Well, thanks for coming around to my original point: people are going to believe whatever they want to believe, so is it even worth reporting or debating?

Ok - so let’s follow your logic through, since there can’t seem to be an agreement on what a legitimate source is for facts. You’re stating, essentially, that the gun industry (which is apparently gun manufacturers, pro-second amendment organizations, related right-wing news outlets, etc.) is intentionally fabricating

Who is “he”?

So anyone that supports constitutional rights can’t be heard from or is it just second amendment supporters that are the problem? I mean, we’re freely considering Media Matters and other left-leaning organizations here, so maybe it is just right-leaning that’s the problem?

Well, see, you can find a problem in citing any source. Someone is always going to claim that their methods and analysis are as they appear to be. You cited the America Journal of Preventive Medicine, to which I would offer this:

I stated my opinion and the sources I used to form that opinion. You are not in a position to place any onus on me for anything. If you don’t like the facts or the source for those facts, that is for you to deal with.

You give me:

But my mother is dead. How is it that she is engaged in the kind of sexual activity that you describe? Please cite your source.

Of course, you’re going to argue against the validity of these points because they were collected together on MediaMatters—in spite of the fact that the people quoted above are legitimate statisticians, academics and scientists.