“I texted this photo to a man who asked me what I was up to. He did not appreciate it.”

I’ve got $53k in private student loans (already consolidated through Wells Fargo). I’m about to sell my house and even after the 20% down payment, I’ll be left with around $40k in profit (I bought a foreclosure in 2011 and fixed it up).

Normally present holes, new holes, or both?

Pushing through the heels is not great advice for uncoached lifters reading this at home.

Getting those starches to break down takes a much higher temp than meat.

Fruit Butter

I’m interested.

This is why I want a LoBF (assuming the data points are accurate, but with only one per t, our sample size doesn’t warrant it). The graph implies linearity between points.

The graph implies a smooth increase in temperature from each time. A scatter plot with no LoBF would have been good. You’re totally right about the multiple pockets.

I appreciate the graph. More Science! But the teacher in me wants a scatter plot with a line of best fit. Never connect the dots unless you’re making whimsical shapes on a Denny’s place mat.

Are you making cheese?

Duck confit! Do multiple trials at 10 degree intervals and show cross sections! Let’s get some scientific method to this madness!

First off, I love these articles. Really great stuff.

The fact that intentional walks are a thing is terrible.

This doesn’t seem to jive with what the Sanders campaign has putout for proposed tax rates.

It doesn’t need to be all skin. It can be all class.

Like I always say, to move boldly into the future, we need only look to the inspiring and empathetic example of South Dakota.

Sledgehammer is a strange word for barely.