Great how consistently this site throws the absolute most misleading titles to articles for that good ol’e click bait. Trash, seen elsewhere first and often with typo articles at that smh.

Would absolutely love for you to title your next article starting with the words “ The worst black people” and see what you get you ignorant hunk of nothing but typos and poorly supported and usually from an another article you just reads opinions for a career.

Dudess crying over a weak ass 1.5, 2 hour raid lol whoo carrress we’ve done it in destiny and tons of other games. We raid again man. Same as everyone else, dog endgame content and want no rng straight give me the rarest then complain of lack of end game items. Now bet this dude will return to a raid he probably would…

From the point of us nearly always being the game testers for rushed AAA games and sub par games, people knowing to wait a month or 2 before buying to avoid the bugs and cheats galore, releasing a portion of the game when dlc items and areas are already in the game and finished instead of a plethora of loot upfront…

Recycling doesnt even scratch the surface of the solution. Stop pushing your own small agendas and ideas as if they’re anything broader than that, especially ignorant ones you know not much of. Stick to copying other gaming related articles.Usually such insignificant biased articles published here..an unusually high…

RRuining it is a blunt and pretty poor opinion that you have written an article on attempting to bring it into face, this poor shoddy opinion of yours.

Same universe doesnt mean titanfall character models were placed in apex, doest help him.

Bangalore looks like a dude with pounds of makeup on and a wig. Some trash here.

Fails to mention the 1st edition charizard is not shadowless making it a lot less valuable, when with that alone in the collection could have seen 20, 35k more no issue.

Or it can cost time and grind but since people love demonizing anything they disagree with and spewing it into a crowd i guess we can ignore that and immediately basically imply cosmetic and additional in game items are required only through purchases eh 1st off who cares enjoy the content you have, cosmetic is…

Uh with Shadowless 1st ed. Charizard selling easily for around 45 to 50 thousands, who really cards the entire rest of the Base set netting basically around the same amount of 15% higher the most lol. Maybe you do not know pokemon well and needed some clickbait since thats all i can conclude of this waste.

Dnt worry that would be a favor,  to not be able to look at this garbage. 

Uh thats the best thing on earth, not able to play this trash!

Actually to fix it, just dont do it lol. If a game is made poorly enough this seems an only option for enjoyment, get a new game or go out, enjoy the damn summer.

Owning a game where cheating/ glitching is the absolute only way to provide a miniscule amount of fun( this is completely useless in any way), I’d be pretty sad with myself. The game is a heavy hot heaping pile of doodoo, i understand a very tiny few kotaku non proof read many error editors enjoy the game but give…

Deserved, for an instance in competition for money or views..views nowadays in turn is money. And cheaters regardless. This is how i see it.

Do not first assume people’s lives or assume they do not have their priorities in order. Priorities in order meaning and equalling All that is left is play time so your comment is ignorance at a pretty high level.

Absolutely inoffensive. I do not know nearly anything of or care about Ninja, but it is transparent when someone plainly dislikes someone and tries to nitpick and rally up any community as a whole to try to make offended because then you will try to transition an entire group into hating someone doing nothing at all…

So every time a video game topic is discussed from another source. You basically change the title words around and write nearly the exact same article? Is this a career you are proud of? Lame every time you post an article, it seems to just copy another article that covered the topic first, only variation is a few…

So very often, would be the frequency of how many times i read an article from a good source and days later you reword the title a bit and publish a near duplicate article only differentiated by several small opinions..how a company takes pride in this or you accept a career that allows such poor effort and basically…