@trek1394:Serious Sam: "Double your gun, double your fun."

@Enorym: That was a huge piece of crap.

Strange to see a lot of people claim that a Ford Taurus was a great car compared to a lot of GMs. At my shop, all I would see is Ford Taurus's.

@oldgraygeek: The Beretta's were pretty good IMO. The only thing wrong they had was that the dashboard would warp, but they replaced that style in 1991, which didn't warp.

@FamilyCarGuy: Considering the fan base of the Fiero, and how well it performed for it's time, I would never call it a failure.

Shit, I'd need a parachute before climbing that high.

That's the reason I stay with GSM networks. Not just for using them over seas, but for switching between GSM networks.

Wouldn't that kill the arrow dynamics? Wouldn't there be better ways to gain speed, without touching the engine?

You call it viral, I call them corporate forum trolls. They exist in every forum, and their job is to sway peoples opinions. In fact, you may even have them that post here in Gizmodo.

@irishelement: Yes, but that's the Nissan GTR. A car built for performance.

@tonyola: Toyota never claimed the tC was a serious sports car, but that didn't stop them from making commercials of these cars acting like a sports car.

@PotbellyJoe - wants to build a little turtle fence around his soul: Why not Honda Civic period? BTW, why are most of the cars on the list domestic? I'm always finding some shit head in a Japanese car. ALWAYS!

The #1 death of cars is purely from owners. The #2 death is taking it to a bad shop for repair.

@irishelement: Corvette also uses leaf springs for a suspension, yet it rips through the Nürburgring just at amazing speeds.

@cheeezwhiz: But in gas mileage? Like I said, look up the MPG of a Honda S2000 vs a Corvette with a LS1 or LS7.

@cheeezwhiz: Considering all the performance mods done to other engines, you'd think people would be use to the harshness of a powerful engine.

@LloydJ: Most Beretta's were with crap 4 cylinder OHC engines. The second most popular engine was the V6, which weren't anything special.

@kaneshadow: The LS1 gets better MPG then VTEC engines. HP/L doesn't matter for jack, but the MPG from the amount of HP you have access too does.

@LloydJ: Don't those engines get horrible gas mileage? The GM Quad 4 W41 produces 190HP and still gets 32 MPG. A Honda S2000 with it's 2 liter 200 hp engine gets 20-24 MPG highway. Though not a B engine, it's very similar.

I always thought the GM Quad 4 was the most advanced 4 banger. A Quad 4 with w41 cams would put out 190hp, stock. This is a NA engine built in the 80's, that has more power output then most modern day 4 cylinders.