“Sperm donation can never be private anymore” appears exactly nowhere in the headline, nor in the body of the article (and no, that claim is not the idea the author is arguing)..

“Sperm donation can never be private anymore” is not the point / argument being made by the author of the article, and the actual point they are making does not assume that the man involved (i.e. the sperm donor) is registered somewhere.

“You’re arguing just to argue now.”

“I made my point. I never tried to convince you or anyone else of anything except the idea that anyone can be found is untrue.” 

““Been rendered obsolete” is the statement in the headline and the article.

The fatal flaw in your argument is the very first line of your initial comment:

Why did you reply to me with this link to your comment? If anything, it undermines your arguments to me.

Don’t know for sure - but if the 23andMe info is correct, we have a good idea which sibling it is. Long story, but the sister who is registered with 23and Me and revealed this information told all but one (male) of us siblings about it (on facebook, of all places) - the one she constantly has an axe to grind with and…

“knowing the members of a family doesn’t mean you know WHO the exact person was that was the sperm donor.”

“They’d still have to tie you, someone NOT on the site, to him.

“Okay, so he wasn’t registered on the site and she found that (apparent) nephew...how then?”

“Because you responded to me as if you didnt’ understand that.”

Well, yes - of course I do.

You understand that family members share DNA, right? I mean, how could you not after reading even just this article?

“Any agreement has to be mutual.”

“I’m speaking to how women’s reputations are often used against them regardless of what the reputation actually is.”

“The fact that the medical examiner presumed her guilt...”

Well, no - the point doesn’t remain, because the issue you speak of is with coroners, not medical examiners (who are educated, trained, and certified). The Front Line episode you referred to even points out that there is a difference between the two:

“Jennings said he’s “never been a fan of [marijuana] going mainstream,” saying it means more people are interested in it just for the profits.”

The fact remains that Hulu considered the material / themes of the story and decided “This is something we can make money off of,” and so went forward with it. Those who work on the show get paid to do so only so that Hulu can make money off of it (by selling it as entertainment).