Which is being bankrolled by this creepy fuck (a.k.a. Robert Mercer):
Which is being bankrolled by this creepy fuck (a.k.a. Robert Mercer):
Robert and Rebekah Mercer. The billionaires who have just turned the USA into an oligarchy.
Because that’s how White Nationalists roll.
Uh huh. But she deserved to die right? Because it’s the death penalty in the Land of the Free to ride in a stolen car when you’re 16. Because property is more important than lives right?
Not a hot take at all. Just a well reasoned opinion that isn’t colored by the cult of children that currently afflicts our society.
One of my favourite bumper stickers:
How injured? I’ve been in a few car accidents and my life wasn’t in danger in any of them. Does a slight whiplash injury justify police in lighting up a car with their guns?
“YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO STOP AND COMPLY! What part of that don’t you understand?”
They really are stupid. Same goes for Global Warming deniers. Every single one I’ve ever talked to ends up being just dim.
Does it say anyone was maimed or killed? You put together a reaonable response but I think people have a tendency to let the drama creep in in situations like this. Car rammed? Well obviously they’re trying to kill and maim! I guess that comes from watching thousands of hollywood car chase scenes with cars getting…
The car was trying to change two lanes at once. It should have stopped once it got into the centre lane, rechecked mirror and over shoulder and then changed into the left hand lane.
Nothing in this world is dumber than a dumb fuck bigot. Nothing.
Seems a little hysterical to assume that someone ramming a car necessarily wants to kill the occupants. Doesn’t it seem just as likely to you that they might have accidentally rammed it or simply rammed it to get past it?
Lol. I think I read pretty well and what I see is that the police *believed* the car had been used in a robbery. The article doesn’t contain much detail but I don’t see that they confirmed that. I don’t see that they have the right to endanger lives simply because a robbery may or may not have occurred. I don’t see…
It sounds like police hadn’t confirmed the car or the people inside were actually connected to the robberies. I’m not making excuses for the driver. If he rammed the police then yes he was asking for trouble. But there has been some ridiculous militarization of the police over the past few decades along with much more…
She was 16. Kids don’t make adult decisions which is why they arent allowed to vote, drink etc. The question isn’t why shouldn’t the police blaze away whenever they detect a potential threat. The question is was it really necessary for them to do so in this case? Yes the car rammed their car but that doesn’t mean…
Therere is nothing in this world dumber than a dumb fuck bigot.
I doubt crazy behaviour and denial about that behaviour are limited to any one ethnicity or skin colour.
Lol. Wow how many comments is that now? You sure got triggered shitgibbon.
What? Bring back the V1?