These aren’t mutually exclusive, you judgmental ass. And i was trying to generate a bit of dark humor, but since that was obviously lost on you, let’s examine, shall we?

My vote? Time-traveling tourists. Sightings are increasing because we’re getting closer to WWIII, a popular destination in time for history buffs.

You really seem to be either incapable or unwilling to read/understand what passes for scientific consensus.

Her choice then are don’t get pregnant, give the baby up for adoption, or parent the child.

I’m arguing that life begins are biological self-support. When you can survive as a living breathing creature, you are alive and human in my book.

https://infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/contradictions.html

It’s called an analogy.

Great - Let’s solve this problem by letting a woman who doesn’t want the “baby” drop the fertilized cells off at the hospital drop-off where abandoned, already born babies go. She goes on with her life, we respect that two-cell “baby”, it goes to medical care providers, and deserving (white) parents get to adopt it.…

I’ve argued before that some of the anti-choice movement, even most of it, really believe what they say.

1.) Yes. Read the bible. The infallible word of god is full of direct contradictions in text as well as behavioral contradictions from god himself.

Repeating you care about children dying, doesn’t make it true. As everything you write after that assertion, proves.

Let’s look at definitions, then:

Rich coming from a guy who’s getting his facts from 2000-year-old fan-fiction.

Science also shows that an omelet is a chicken. Gotcha.

I believe it is a pretty crappy deal for a child to be born into a position in life where a parent knows that they would not be able to/or capable of taking care of said child. Children don’t deserve to be born into a foster care system. They don’t get the love, support, and attention that they need...Yes adoptions…

Your first paragraph is disingenuous in the extreme. Your defense for putting kids in camps, a lot of whom have been verifiably separated from their migrant parent(s) who crossed with them, doesn’t address anything, just makes excuses for it. Basically, you’re saying that though some kids have died avoidable deaths…

Let me help you out with some of your delusions:

Are you also supporting the right-to-life of cancer cells? Seems logically consistent with your major stance here...

These aren’t vulnerable children, you strawman-burning tool. But i’m sure you’ve adopted plenty of unwanted children so you can maintain your perceived moral superiority, yes?

An embryo at 6-8 weeks is not a person, not a child, not even a fetus. It has no “heartbeat” because there is no heart. It doesn’t feel pain. If you are a Christian who believes that life begins at conception, then you also have to believe that God lets over 50% of human life die, as half of fertilized eggs fail to…

When you start supporting causes to end murder outside the womb, you can start legitimately talking about murder inside the womb.