duckinthefaceat250knots
duckinthefaceat250knots
duckinthefaceat250knots

We shouldn’t anthropomorphize machines anyway. They hate it.

I blame the English language. It’s not Natasha’s fault that “All you can eat” can be singular or plural (and boo to Denny’s for taking advantage of the ambiguity). This wouldn’t have happened in Shakespeare’s day. When the tavern had an “All thou canst eat” special, everybody knew it only meant thee, not thy whole

Also, he claims that when it eventually arrived:

I think by purchasing a VW you already signed up for the brand stigma that comes with questionable reliability.

I feel like you use “logic” and words that aren’t what you think they are. I’m also 100% positive you didn’t read the entire article but took the Fox News approach of highlight reading and cherrypicking things that set your panties on fire.

You’re lost, this isn’t Fox “News”.

How is this a manipulation? It seems to be a basic critique based on facts and reality. Although that seems to be two things that are in short supply within the right these days.

Block quoting large portions of text to provide context = manipulating statements? Since you seem to have missed the link at the top even after it being pointed out to you:

Read the democratic debate break down clearly linked at the top of this article and see the mention of the upcoming democratic debate in the conclusion. Read before you comment please. Oh and not everyone puts on a team jersey everyday and cheers blindly like an idiot for one side or the other. There is no place for

(Whatever the result from the equation above) squared

In lieu of family support, I have boxes of wine.

Mining operations aren’t cheap, and evidence says that the Air Force straight up DESTROYED some of their operations, so I’d say that 5.2 million is lowballing what they are owed. Severely.

Remember kids: Black Lives Matter is a bunch of whiners who are looking for reasons to be offended. The real oppression is a lack of Christmas iconography on your coffee cups.

I don’t know. They may have a point. Those cups don’t look anything like the ones Jesus drank his Gingerbread Lattes out of.

Many of my arch-conservative friends keep complaining about the “liberal” media falsely attacking Carson, while simultaneously complaining about how that same supposedly liberal media always giving Clinton a free pass. Reality. What a concept.

Well, I mean, technically he is correct — no one ever asked Obama or Clinton why they lied about meeting Gen Westmoreland or pretended to stab a guy or invented stickup or created an imaginary Most Honest Student award at Yale that makes so sense. So they’ve never faced exactly the kind of scrutiny that Carson has.

He also claims Obama never got any scrutiny. It’s kind of amazing—as with the rest of his lies, he seems to be so divorced from reality that he truly doesn’t understand that something doesn’t become true just because he pretends it is.

So when he says none of the other candidates have had this kind of scrutiny, he surely must mean the Republican ones. Because Hillary seems to have had quite a bit of backlash and scrutiny over Benghazi. Or did I imagine that?

I think he’s saying, be on high hypocracy alert if you’re accusing the russians of fucking with undersea cables.