Given the involvement of roger fucking stone with the first allegations, and the extent of the ratfucking ops now made clear by WaPo, I need to know how splinter/jez validated this claim, and why they are convinced that allowing the accuser anonymity is the correct choice.
Mostly non-offensive, sure. But only mostly.
Ive seen “its probably not as bad as you’re thinking, because building and fire codes” which is possibly the most 2017 thing to say ever.
Want to take this opportunity to plug the Prison University Project, which operates an accredited 2-year college that takes place within San Quentin, one of only 2 or 3 institutions that do this in the US. Bard College is another, but I’m unaware of any others unless there are new ones in the last several years. Most… Read more
I think this is a very fraught position for everyone. It feels like there is a real possibility of retrenchment of the bullshit idea that gay men are more likely to be child molesters or exploiters. And this would be via patriarchal-male displacement of their dissatisfaction with the idea that they can no longer… Read more
My personal favorite, seen on another websight, is “sexy antifa”
Chris Cillizza(spit), is that you?
So, first let’s set aside the fact that the first amendment rights of students are so circumscribed at this point to be nonexistent after the “bong hits 4 Jesus” case. Before DeVos(spit) was in charge of the DoE my laypersons understanding was that it would be really hard to require a positive act/speech like standing… Read more
Bless your heart.
How about “prostrate massage” ?