Danica McKellar as Diana For. The. Win.

Lucasarts is a notoriously demanding partner, and generally holds the majority of power in any marketing relationship. Star Wars Galaxies was put out of its misery met its own fate for similar reasons.

Bad enough they're rebooting established characters. But wedging in another continuity and its characters and elements in the process? Epic. Frakking. Fail.

New Dream Park material? Huzzah!

Zardoz cosplay. Gotta love Dragon*Con!

The study can only show what it's set to measure. You'd have to look at long term studies (if they exist) on long-term exposure to the common pesticides etc. to see if that's any benefit, though I imagine there's at least a marginal improvement. I suspect, though, that any such benefits aren't going to get much of a…

It varied wildly. I gave up on it early on, largely because I was a fan of the original Stormwatch book and was extremely displeased with how it was ended (killed off in an Aliens crossover). A fair bit of it became an exercise in the idea of a 'pro-active' team, which got bogged down in writer's philosophies at…

It's also what the Authority derived from. It's complicated, and I have no idea what they're up to with this on account of having not picked up anything DC or Wildstorm in a decade or more, but I do remember that much.

Erm, you do realize Fred Weasley died in the Battle of Hogwart's, right? So that might not be one of the best choices for the list...

Yes.

We're unusual in that we alter our environment in ways and on scales that are, to the best of our knowledge, unmatched on the planet. That does tend to place us in a class of our own for many purposes, for good or ill.

Skynet called. It asked you to make sure 'Angry Birds' was installed standard.

The panel must be made up of scientists rejected by both parties. I expect a full accounting of each candidate's stance on phlogiston theory and applied phrenology as a result.

Personally, I've never been clear whether folks got stupid from the pot, or smoked it by the bushel because they were fools. (Please note, I'm not talking occasional use, I'm talking permastoners here.) Guess it's a bit of both...

If it's all the same to you, I'll go with 'none of the above'.

That picture is on purpose, by the way. That little crossover explains everything about why any given superhero's status quo goes wonky over time. Don't have to be a Sim fanboy to get that one.

The biggest problem with superhero romances is that they're subject to that most ineffable of all external circumstances, the one to which even the mightiest among them must inevitably bow: change of author and editor.

At what point does this principle start forcing people to needlessly reinvent the wheel, figuratively if not literally? I'm not convinced this is a good thing, at all, but I guess we're going to find out...

They're already on the 'vat meat' idea. I suspect that's going to impact the equation to some extent, maybe not in the near future, but certainly within a few decades.

Make that Michael Crichton's Andromeda Strain. Man had a way of making science scary. (I do not consider that entirely a bad thing. An unbalanced view of science—good or bad—is an open invitation to disaster.)