Well, to be completely fair, you can *always* make products better and learn from what worked well and what didn't... I know a lot of people who have last years iPhone4 model and have never experienced a real life issue with the antenna. That said, I'm all for making products better :)

So, am I the only one who immediately thought that a name like "quikflix" would have been infinitely better than quikster? At least with something along the lines of quikflix there would be some cohesion with the netflix brand.

Most of the people I know are from 2015, its been a huge help to me for the last four years now...

I've had one for exactly a year now and couldn't be happier... I'm not upgrading this year, but I may be persuaded next go around. It really is one of those devices that the more you use it, the more you wonder how you got by without it :)

@Scytale: I agree with you that AirVideo has the best video quality when you are running it over a wi-fi connection, but over 3G it was not as watchable as Zumocast or StreamToMe.

@dagamer34: I personally like StreamToMe better than air video, because it also handles mp3... but better still is Zumocast, which is free and covers video, audio, and file access.

@DingoJunior: I'm assuming that was rhetorical :) ... but in case not, you're right, it can't... information lost during compression is gone.

@psybab: Why would you want to *delete* the higher quality AAC encode, then you'd have lost the higher quality audio permanently? As you said, iTunes will convert to mp3, and disk space is cheap...

Does screens push the audio of the remote host? That's one thing missing from Ignition... Thanks.

@kdupree: and you won't regret it for one second... my iPad is the single best gadget I have ever owned... and I've been through a lot of gadgets :)

@Chernobyl: I was really looking forward to unconfirmed item 7... which may allow unconfirmed item 12 (assuming apple allows it, and if not, there's always jail breaking).

@godawgs7: I love crab and lobster... the biggest problem is always getting them *out* of the shell! This makes me want to eat crab, lot and lots of crab :) Thanks for posting the video.

@MyNameisn'tEarl: Yeah, I'll bet you're right. With bluetooth and a few more basic apps (maybe a calculator, time tracker for work, calendar syncing, stuff like that), this thing would be really sweet.

@MyNameisn'tEarl: You need headphones... no speaker, or bluetooth

@Dan: it shows up in a search, but gives the "your request could not be completed" error if you try to load it... could be in the process of being pulled.

@Stem_Sell: Yeah, I have to agree with you on the whole back lit keyboard thing... why is everyone complaining, it's not like this is the mid-80s and nobody is familiar with the keyboard. At this point if you need to look at the keyboard to type, well, let's just say that's pretty disappointing :)

@sparklelabs: I would really be interested in an Arduino programming class. Thanks!

@Munksey: It's because the resistor's only job is to limit the amount of current flowing through the diode... you can think about it like how water flows through a pipe, if you restrict the flow of water *anywhere* in the pipe, the overall flow through the pipe will be reduced. It's the same concept here :)

@Ellomdian: I agree completely with Spoony. And with what Matt said in his article, most people *won't* leave their carrier just for a phone... I will buy an iPhone the second one that will run on Sprint's network comes out, until then I'll stay moderately happy with my Android OS, but away from AT&T.

@cc: Yeah, that's true about people not completely powering down electronics prior to take-off... however, the only real reason they want devices to be turned off is so they are not a distraction when the safety info is being conveyed. There is no actual hazard to the aircraft by leaving the devices on/partially on.