The Mazda is strikingly good looking in person. Saw one in white over the weekend and it looks very premium and upscale.

Don’t think it’s actually a 4.0 liter I6. What’s up with all of the errors in these buyer guides? I’m just glancing around spotting them.

Isn’t that the same thing that’s giving honda troubles in F1 this past season?

They left the battery terminal cover flap up.

That’s not to even mention any of the P cars.

Well written article, enjoyable to read.

Oh the gas mileage.

18 19” Brakes? That can’t be right.

“The DSG with this engine is a potent pairing, giving this 3,300 pound hatch acceleration figures unheard of on a compact hatchback.”

Little more if you consider the GTS at 500hp.

http://www.2addicts.com/forums/attachm…

All they had to do was this.

I’m thinking it might just be the color and the lighting not doing it any justice, but it seems very...off. The front would look better on a car with a different shape. The front seems tacked on a little too low or something.

Sobieski is another one that’s been missed. It has replaced Stoli in our house and is a lot cheaper.. worth a try for sure.

This area seems very boring.

Thanks for making me not have to Google what an 88 GTA looked like after reading about it in the Road & Track PCOTY article.

Are those Mazda Mx-6 tail lights?

Nice looking new G35 Coupe

All of these things are blocked though. What am I supposed to do, work?

Current Lambo that catches fire in traffic...