“wrists on the top of your steering wheel” - lost in translation of typing.

Intention for this portion was there. Rest was a bit of a refresher course! :D

What’s the point of designing, essentially, tanks, as far as visibility goes, if they have such poor crash and roof strength ratings? What does all that metal do anyways? There’s hardly any glass to look out of.

Here you go! :D

I nominate this for COTD. But you picked the wrong crowd; the accurate one is where everyone is holding out smart phones.

“Measures taken from the dummy indicate a high likelihood of serious lower leg injuries.”

That’s plum crazy talk! Challenger drivers don’t need their left leg anyway, there’s only one pedal that matters, and it’s on the right.

No fair, they didn’t test the Mustang in real-world conditions.

I’m more surprised at the fact that the Camaro has only an “Acceptable” rating on roof strenght with those big pillars.

This is why mustangs have that reputation. The challenger owner are less likely to survive to do it again.

Alternate Headline

After getting asspacked by a church van in my Ecoboost Stang. I’d say based on that alone, I’d buy another.

I don’t think James Bond movies have anything to worry about. It looks like they basically just push down on them.

how do they test roof strength? Is it anything like how the causes the Aston to roll in Casino Royale? If so that would be cool to see the test happen

No Mustang driver cares about how their car does when crashing into a wall. What they really want to know is if their car survives hitting large groups of pedestrians.

Why say millennial when you can just say “product of the baby boomers?”

eye for an eye

That's the spirit!

If we were able to land on the Moon with a CPU that had 64Kbyte of memory and operated at 0.043MHz we should be able to make this ride work with an Apple iPhone 3G. Lets do it.