drskeep
DrSkeep
drskeep

Justice Pubic Hair — you are old enough to remember his televised hearing, yes? — a whining, entitled grifter, is the prototypical emblem of our increasingly supernaturalistic culture. He’s part of the Krazy Katholic Kabal + Amy, the odious group that’s responsible for degrading what used to be SCOTUS into our

As a fellow Old Guy, I’m impressed. And for those who fantasize that genes-don’t-count, look at this Old Guy’s son in that F1 Ferrari.

Wow. I had the same car — same color, same trim, same 0% 72-mo. no money down deal, good price and the dealer was finally convinced to throw in the roof rails (for my kayak). Saw only a few of them on the road in 43,467 miles of driving. Best car I ever had to that point. Indeed, my wife and I lived out of it for most

Rat own, bruthuh. And my ‘22 Arteon is even better — better motor, 300 bhp; better tranny, 7-spd DSG; nicer interior. And still the loveliest car in the parking lot.

About the best car to fit my needs, ever. Mine was totalled by, seriously, a fierce MN hailstorm 10 months ago, otherwise I’d still have it.  And I had it on a zero down, zero % GMAC loan, too.  I have to stop now.  I hate to cry in public.

Deuce-and-a-half.  No contest.  Took both hands, and I was young and healthy.

He’s F1's Great White Hope.  And he knows it.  And he acts like it.  And he expects to get away with running other drivers off the track.  I think his most hate-able quality is that whiney sense of entitlement he exudes.

Oh, why do those GOTPers hate Jesus? Oh. Wait. They love Jesus. Well, that explains it then.

It’s understandable that Tuppence would be fixated on “assault on democracy”. The fantasy world he lives in, Christian Dominionism, is by definition an assault on democracy — it is an imagined scheme of uber-authoritarianism (an omnipotent god), arbitrary rules (uttered by this imaginary god) and absolute punishments

Do we really not get the Establishment Clause, why our Founders tried to keep supernaturalism out of gummint? Do we not see that, because religions are words-only constructs (no external referents), they are not amenable to rational discussion, that differences generated by religious fantasies can only be resolved by