No one has ever actually litigated what a "for cause" firing actually means. We know Congress can impose them, and whatever happened in Humphrey's Executor wasn't "for cause" but there's no way of knowing if it would be read broadly or narrowly.

Maybe. There's this weird idea floating around that Morrison v. Olson isn't good law anymore, despite never being overruled. Free Enterprise Board v. PACOB didn't really disavow it either.

I love how typos often convey an appropriate meaning too. That's why I never check for them.

I know you meant golf, but "play gold" works on multiple levels.

Well that's kind of a waste of time. If the Fisher case is any indication, the people who think they are harmed by these policies didn't have stellar applications to begin with and they end up going to a decent school anyway. If colleges just follow the Univeristy of Texas's model for using race holistically and don't…

So they have kid-fire power plants in Eastern Kentucky now? I'll withhold my judgment until I see some emissions data.

This will be controversial as far as style goes since too much snark (or any) is kind of frowned upon in legal writing. But it was an amicus not a party so that's probably better. And it did really bring home the point that it's pretty offensive to even ask a court for a content based prior restraint on talking about…

I don't think Hillary Clinton is a saint, and like any high profile politician she's probably made some serious missteps and has done acts at odds with rhetoric etc. But it's really quite sad that a whole industry developed devoted to destroying the reputation of a competent person who really truly believes in public…

That's not ironic! That's just coincidental!

I'd rather Murphy skipped ahead towards working on the Clinton Impeachment one.

Is it mean to point out that Pickle seemed to have terrible spelling skills, even for a nine year old? So it sort of makes sense that he would be a Trump supporter.

I don't understand what "grabbing by the pussy" does either. It invokes horrific imagery, obviously, but even in the best of contexts it doesn't seem enjoyable or practical for anyone.

Well the phony Russia story is being promoted by loser liberals like the Senate Intelligence Committee, two former Republican FBI directors, and Donald Trump Jr., so that checks out.

Why isn't anyone talking about how Podesta said he was passing those sticks crossed, when they were uncrossed!

No one is better at snipe hunting than me, believe me.

And Trump Vodka! Oh my God! Does Mueller know about the vodka!?

Luckily for us, most of his branding ventures are spectacular failures. Trump Scouts would end up in another class action settlement.

I edited it. Thanks for preserving the mistake of fat fingers.

That's Crooked Hillary for you, always keeping a low profile and rarely loudly commenting on any of her potential legal issues. It's all to keep the leftwing fake news media focused on Trump, and not because she's a thoughtful private citizen.

So there's no doubt he probably has lots of crazy stories given his life, but he's so rambley and self-focused he could never tell a good one. I mean look at the pussy grabbing tape, that wasn't even a good sex story.