It's a private obstetrics office. Of the three doctors/business partners, one of them is a woman of color (Mindy). One of the two administrators is a woman of color. One of the two nurses is a man, the other is a senior woman.
It's a private obstetrics office. Of the three doctors/business partners, one of them is a woman of color (Mindy). One of the two administrators is a woman of color. One of the two nurses is a man, the other is a senior woman.
On one occasion and then got fired, you mean?
Yessss. I knew it was that guy based just on the screenshot. I love those so much.
No, it's born of straight women's privilege — as our "allies" — to treat us like puppies and clowns.
You are on a roll this morning.
Fantastic.
Yeah, why should anyone be judged for their behavior?
This was great. Thank you.
Probably a little OTT, you're right about that. But in terms of self-satire, I think it would be hard to beat the original "Shh, white people are talking" response. Don't you?
That passing privilege gives her a unique perspective on the rigid binary talked about in the article? That "intersectionality" continues to be mostly used by white people to describe other people's minority status for them? That expressing self-centered outrage about this topic in any direction is itself a huge…
Yeah, I put that in but then took it out because it seemed like that was part of what was confusing.
You might be thinking of an unrelated character from another (obsolete) continuity, Kathy Kane, who used the same codename from 1956-79?
Well, that's kind of what he's saying: "We don't know what to do with wives besides kill them, so why not just shortcut past the whole thing?" I don't think his editorial allergy to creativity is really the fault of the Jezebel commentariat in this case.
If I'm reading your incomprehensible question correctly, Kate Kane has been a lesbian since the character was introduced in the summer of 2006. Also, that's not how gay people work.
Okay, so that's now four common words you don't understand and have created personal definitions for — actually five, including your counterintuitive use of "civil" above to describe "being a total dick" — and still somehow you feel justified in acting like a butthurt troll about it. Are there any words you can think…
...Lol. There's my irony requirement for the day.
"Ingratiating"? Is that another word nobody really knows the definition of?
^ I'm screencapping this for internet court!
It always is, it's so fucked up. Rape is a male crime, perpetrated against men and women. Anyone who sells this bullshit is taking you on a ride, and the fact that he focuses on the gender of the rapist — rather than that of the victims — tells you everything about how warped he's got it. Basic downhill…
You're going to have a hard time if you always demand that everyone around you use your made-up, incredibly personal definitions for words and concepts. Can you not see how defining things that way ensures that you'll be "right," no matter how wrong you might actually be? It's not a very efficient or pleasant way to…