Ea is the worst company in the world the same way Conan O'Brien could be the next President of the United States, bacon is a food group, Arrested Development renders the ratings system irrelevant: Internet dorks en masse misrepresenting actual public opinion. I've never understood this need, any more than I understand…

I can't tell you what a relief it is to see how many people gave their Shep their own name. I just thought it meant I was bad at video games.

Absolutely the worst person.

"...[T]he short isn't intended as any kind of fan fiction..."

Oh ok.

Khandaker continued: "If you think that minority representation in games is pushing some kind of agenda or [is] being politically correct, you're already living an agenda every day. It's already fucking political. It's always been political, and the only reason we don't realize it is that it's been so political for so…

This was amazing, thank you so much.

I've fervently agreed with everything you've said on this post, but I'm not convinced about this point. It's possible to care about more than one thing. Everything that rises must converge. Working towards gay rights doesn't hurt transgender people — lack of activism for and by transgender people hurts transgender…

Lol. "Doesn't diversity imply homogeneity?"

Exactly. It's not even trolling, just eyes-open derailing. With a vengeance.

Beautiful.

"Why can't there be more black burglars in home alarm system commercials, black crackheads played for comic effect, black prostitutes walking the streets? That's what real equality would be: Everybody being treated the same amount of shit, by me. If you really wanted equality, you'd go backwards." — the voice of…

"It's not like he rapes her!" — Our new [self-elected] house expert in gender issues.

That's a lot of intentional misreading just to justify whining like a butthurt crybaby. Part of male privilege is the option to ignore the conversation, because you're too busy feeling persecuted to bother understanding it. Maybe if you weren't so interested in making absurd, reductionist arguments that have nothing…

So are you be proving your point when you tell everyone we're not allowed to use the word unless we get your permission first, or when you inform us that only you get to define what it is? Christ, the irony.