dropthepilot
dropthepilot
dropthepilot

Yes, and imagine how you'd feel if she'd actually advocated anything like this — or if you'd read the original sources. Or even read just the article itself, beyond the headline.

I doubt the veracity of the spoiler. I just did an image search for Jessica and she is exactly nothing remotely like the people Claude is supposed to fuck. If you see what I mean.

"My own lack of self-control renders your point invalid."

That made sense at one point, but nowadays I think a better embargo standard would be, "If you really cared enough to throw a whiny fit about it on the internet — after searching out a thread or post and reading it without caring whether there would be spoilers — then you'd have read/watched it by now."

This is great.

@Groo8: There were only three sentences total. It's a press release: That's the definition of "marketing crap." Not a synopsis.

@NoelVeiga: Exactly. Which is clearly all Joss was saying. Jolie is the afterthought — the label he eventually put on it after explaining the concept a million times several years ago — not the point.

@Doinker: Defense calls X-Necrosha to the stand.

@Machinetd: Five whole years? I'm thinking the Scarlet Witch will be decimating all Bat-themed heroes by June.

I didn't see it as a comment on horror or movies, particularly: Just a really scary demonstration of Paul's power over the family, which is absolute.

@hdgotham (Hannah Wilson): Or at least in how you should take a nap first. It read like a Powerpoint presentation of the Cliff's Notes for someone's experience of actually reading the book.

First one's not bad. Cleverly written, neat mythology system.

I liked that Black Hole ending a lot more when it included "All Along The Watchtower" playing for no damn reason.

@wagedomain: He was "humbled" by dying to save that old man. The specials last year set up the God Complex storyline, which resolved itself in Ten's regeneration. Different writer, different actor, vastly different show.

@sollipse: I didn't call Amy a whore. Quite the opposite, in fact. Please reread.

Honestly, how could he tell?

@jdskeleven: "For no reason"? Have you seen the show before? I mean, misogyny is in the eye of the beholder, I suppose, but it's not like they just met.