An upvote does not appropriately convey how much I agree with this statement, hence I shall add this verbal construct for added emphasis.

I will admit that I have a very high tolerance for gratuitous violence and nudity in my entertainment, so that's not really an issue for me (I actually kind of enjoy it). But I can totally see how it would be too much for somebody who's not quite as blunted as I am. It's definitely a very violent seasons, both in…

Frank is definitely the highlight of this season for me.

I had issues with that too. Frank and Karen have both killed people, so I figured she was trying to prove that Frank is still good in order to prove to herself that she too is still good, despite having killed.

I think you forgot the fourth prong: Watching Frank kill gangsters is kind of awesome. Or is that just me?

Hehe, yeah, I suppose that's true.

Yeah, I think the "guilt does weird things to people and logic isn't necessarily the governing factor" approach is probably the most plausible one. I suppose the way they did it just didn't work particularly well for me.

Season 4 started last week, only seven more episodes to go until the show is over. Next episode airs tomorrow if I'm not mistaken.

I think that might indeed be it, but how the hell she could ever think that she's comparable to Frank Castle is beyond me. She shot one dude in order to stay alive (and after he'd threatened the people she cared about). Frank Castle systematically hunted down and murdered several dozen people.

The way in which they portrayed the connection between Frank and Karen seemed a bit weird to me if I'm being honest.

The scene set to Down Boy in the season 1 finale of Life is one of my all-time favorite things ever shown on TV. Such awesomeness.

Agreed, but I won't complain too much, because we actually get Banshee reviews on this site from a writer who's enthusiastic about the show and the comment section is usually pretty fun.

It his, however, a vastly superior show.

I still wouldn't say all hope is lost in that case. For example, I would hope that researchers would keep something as dangerous as that pathogen not easily accessible for a bunch of animal activists who break into a lab, that it's as well secured as other highly dangerous pathogens which exist in our world. Not that…

Alas, you can never win against the needs of the plot.

I did when I first came into this article. At that point I think it the negative comments were more along the lines of "She's fat!" or "She's ugly!" or "Being fat is unhealthy!" rather than "Butbut, life is worse for guys!"

As a side note: I am grateful for you engaging me in a civil and respectful manner instead of going all flamewar on my buttocks. Maybe we will still disagree to some extent when all is said and done, but I appreciate the opportunity to reflect upon and refine my arguments and viewpoints on this matter. It's difficult…

Yes, definitely a fair point. As said, completely hijacking a comment section is not what I'd consider right. But I'll try to judge these matters case by case, and it's not like we have 50 breitbarters in here going on about how men have it so much more difficult than women and how insisting on equal rights means that…

As best as I can tell without watching the show, that doesn't seem to be too far off the mark.

But that's part of my point: I wouldn't usually consider a person (woman/man/other) doing that as "derailing discussion", since the discussion does not have one single unique coherent thread, but is instead being carried out by many people in many concurrent threads at the same time. Adding a new thread does not stop…