dribbles
Dribbles
dribbles

Re-read your own post, please, and view the inherent contradiction. You say men shouldn't take it personally but then you say all men are inherently sexist. How do we refrain from taking that personally?

"Men are a problem"

I must argue that it's a gross oversimplification to say that rape at the hands of an acquaintance can be boiled down into something as simple as the victim being a poor judge of character. More often than not we're simply all trained to trust family implicitly, rape by someone close is an abrogation of that trust by

The thing about "NotAllMen" is we KNOW that. So here's the thing guys; if you truly believe that you're not part of the problem, then why not assume we're not talking about you and settle the fuck down.

You Jezzies a riot. A man comes on here to agree with you and you ride the shit out of him.

I am nothing if not consistent, unless I have been drinking or I am bored in which case I will change my mind and convictions on whim.

Dont smile and say hi. Why the hell would you smile and say hi to someone you dont know at 10pm at night?

You realise that by trying to appear non-threatening, avoiding eye contact etc you are probably heightening the fear she feels because you are acting in a manner that isnt natural.

How cute. She's excited to be Fox New's chocolate flavor of the week. She loves being the token Aunt Tom who co-signs with white supremacy. I look forward to people making fun of her, including Jon Stewart.

Sarah Palin IS intellectually impaired. She can see Russia from her house.

You know, we give them a hard time. But FOX is doing a good thing hiring all these intellectually challenged people.

There is no such thing as 1000%.

I did because I wasn't judging the article on anything other than it's claims, which are taken from sources like the BJS. Plus I agree with a lot of the article. So why the hell wouldn't I think I was giving them a "gotcha" link.

Because being entitled, and a man, does not automatically make you a mass murderer. I thought that was understood by now. How far we've come, intellectually.

Also, that's called confirmation bias. You cherry pick isolated incidences, usually ones that are what used to be called "crimes of passion", in an attempt to show how dastardly and devilish men are in regards to women as a whole. As though women aren't being just as violent for the same reasons. You wanna talk

Wow. Laci, if you knew anything about what you were talking about then you would be more careful than to trivialize what a mass murderer did into being the consequence of a systemic form of gender entitlement. That's absolutely insulting, and you should feel ashamed of yourself for so quickly jumping on the

I mean, it's not like she does't know she's getting into helicopters etc. This is going to happen. She needs to come up with a plan for how she's going to avoid it.

this isnt even the first time it has happened. It is a bit weird but its not like this photographer used some long range lens to get these pics-it was a royal function. she was meant to be photographed. She can spend billions on her hair but cant manage hem weights or at least underwear when wearing a short dress??

Am I going to hell now that I've seen the future Queen of England's butt cheek? We used to think that if we saw a nun's hair.