drewf650gs
DrewS
drewf650gs

Lots of it, my friend.

Clowns don’t care about your all-caps rants about lowballers, while normal people will assume they’re gonna show up to a red-faced psycho who will yell at them.

I had a bicycle on CL that was getting zero attention. Finally a guy showed up, rode the bike, said he wanted it, but didn’t have the money. What he did have was a Chinese SKS assault rifle. I took it. No paperwork, nothing. Every single Australian I’ve ever told this story to refuses to believe it. Until I pull the

If you bothered, there are plenty of comments here with good explanations about why you are wrong regarding Tesla.

It’s only controversial if you hate Tesla or Musk to begin with. If you go into this believing everything they are and do is bad, it’s no great stretch to see this as further proof.

If 16GB is all I need and it’s cheaper than the 32GB option, then yes. Why the fuck would I care? I got exactly what I paid for.

I mean, the difference between a BMW 320i and 328i is a tune. Is that a scam too?

Unfortunately, I gotta say there’s a whole lotta stupid in these replies. People lambasting Tesla for limiting the range of their cars... well, take a second to think. What device are you reading this article on? Phone, tablet, desktop, it doesn’t matter - it contains a processor. And a company makes that processor,

You can also draw more current out of a 75kWh pack, so the “60” cars have just as much power on tap as a 75.

they are unlikely to be interested in your offer

I really don’t understand the anger towards Tesla regarding these cars. Tesla wanted to get more of their cars into customers’ hands, so they detuned some of their 75kWh cars and sold them at a discount. The customers knew their cars were detuned and bought them because that was the only way they could afford a new

That’s such a useless semantic difference my face hurts. It’s up to Tesla to determine what a car sells for, everything else is how you feel. Everybody is “getting what they paid for” because there is no deception at the point of sale.

perhaps helping the prosecutor when the erratic driver was taken to trial.

No and no. Many ex-military members are rejected from serving as officers because they’re ex-military. There are of course exceptions but those usually are due to nepotism.

“he wanted a blood sample from the reserve officer to establish that he wasn’t in any way inebriated while driving that big truck. He was looking out for a fellow policeman”

Because cops here believe they exist to protect each other instead of serving the public. It’s them against us so regardless of our innocence, we’re all suspects until we prove otherwise.

From what I understand they wanted his blood so that they can test it and hopefully it will come back as dirty (drugs or alcohol etc.). Then if he wanted to bring a civil suit against the department for being injured due to thier high speed chase, which I think is against the departments policy, they can bring up his

Why are US police so violent towards everybody? Are they afraid? Insecure? Misogynists? Wannabe-army? What’s wrong with them? The police in the UK would never handle a sober, non-aggressive, non-violent suspect in this manner, let alone another member of an emergency service. In the UK this would be big news, and

Once Payne and his superior who pushed him are fired and unable to find another job, then I’ll believe in that “goodness of society”.

Two for New Jersey. Thank God I don’t live there.