I'm sorry, but this is a clearly wasted opportunity to bring back box flares in a big way. Disappointed.

The New Jersey traffic circle is the perfect example of why roundabouts haven't caught on the US. They are huge, confusing (with inconsistent yields), and largely used in places with too many lanes to be effective. They also have New Jersey drivers on them, which makes anything seem mildly insane.

I'm pretty sure you can assume it's a derivative heap of shit, like most everything Disney pushes out these days.

Already dug the Duster quite a bit, now I dig it A LOT. They're cheap and good looking compact SUVs with one of the most honest designs on the road today. Making a batshit crazy Pikes Peak version is an awesome coup by Dacia (Renault) in my book.

I think the fact is that most Mac users will like this very much and praise it (as they have, for the most part, with WP7's interface). The real argument against MS and Windows however, appears to still be present here - and that's a confused mess of styles and an overly complicated system.

Hot wife, and let's not forget the child he had with Heidi Klum too, eh?

Ironically, here in the Netherlands, the meat is usually free range and grass-fed, locally produced, and hormone-free. You can't even buy a steak here that's big enough to make the grade at 90% of American restaurants. So I imagine this research probably has more to do with long-term problems of providing sufficient…

I personally find that the giant oil smudge on the lens adds an air of authenticity and isn't distracting at all.

Completely agree. Bloat and busyness has replaced clean, elegant design in too many recent models. Damn shame.

Yuck. I think they've decided to show it at Shanghai because it's like a Chinese copy of the formerly nice looking Malibu.

Isn't this just an updated version of the already-existent XV with the new, uglier Impreza design that was leaked the other day?

Or "how to become the most popular girl in school, the hard way"...

I'm sorry, that Peugeot's just a remix of the Nissan Altima.-.-

And for a minute there I thought you were going to say he was pushing for Hollywood to stop greenlighting complete garbage aimed at lowest common denominator teens, and for his next movie Cameron was going to use a decent script and actors.

That's right, but luckily nobody said Jim Clark was killed in an F1 car. The article says Jim Clark was killed in a Lotus, which he was, and that the program is about F1 racing in the 60s and 70s, which it is.

Exactly. More about the era than explicitly F1.

But the reason it's included is because it was the same teams (Lotus), drivers (Clark, Hill), and tracks (Hockenheim) as F1, and even with smaller engines, the problems (unsafe conditions) and results (death) were the same. In fact, the Lotus 48 in which Clark was killed was previously raced in F1 (in 1967), so it was…

F1 in the 1960s didn't have a sponsor, nor a strong governing body or rights-holder. Jim Clark, already multiple world champion in F1 by this time, was racing both F1 and F2 (along with almost all of the drivers of the day), therefore creating the overlap. By comparing that era to today's F1 and GP2, both strictly…

The documentary does make a point to differentiate that, but it's kind of like separating Sprint Cup and Nationwide races. If Dale Earnhardt had been killed in a Nationwide race, we'd still consider it a "NASCAR accident".

I caught it the other night on BBC4 and can say that this film is a truly terrific (and terrifying) look at the insanity of a time that many of us look back on as the "glory years" of F1. The images are graphic and the interviews poignant, and the gruesome images of burning bodies make a horrifying counterpoint to…