i’m not surprised, not after I saw how many horrible trump supporters attacked the Parkland kids for daring to engage in activism.  

My mind just breaks in half that anyone would be criticizing her.  Like, it just crashes like a overloaded computer.

I’m actually going to be the contrarian for once:

I bet if you have a gun to protect yourself, I can still kill you before you get me.  Your gun won’t protect you from someone dead set on catching you by surprise.

Oh, I'm sure she would have had ample time to pull out her gun and shoot him when he came after her. He probably would have stopped the assault and given her time to put down her books and draw her weapon. He seems like a fair man.

“In no way am I saying this is her fault, but here’s how it’s her fault.”

I am offended by that insinuation!

She could have owned a gun, but she couldn’t carry it on campus or in University housing.

Um, no. That’s a fantasy instilled by NRA death cult propagandists.

It won’t work. Ask JFK, Ronald Reagan, and Gerald Ford**. All of whom were surrounded by people expert in the use of guns, and none who were protected by using those guns.

Were you high when you watched it? Because this column feels like the result of having watched it high.

It’s such a tragic situation because once a crime has happened it’s too late.

What is the best way for law enforcement to handle this kind of thing? My question is sincere and is in no way meant to absolve the campus police or SLCPD.

As a former food stamp recipient (and WIC baby), fuck Trump.

Oh, you want bread and fish?
Get a job!
- Republican Jesus

Since actions speak louder than words, nobody in government that claims to be a Christian is one. If they were, they wouldn’t be voting to take people’s only means of survival away, or bombing countries that didn’t attack us, or letting mass loss of life from gun violence continue (not to mention children were gunned…

Ah, thanks for the info. I’ve heard young people who don’t seem to be fascists using it casually and thought the poster might be one of them and unaware of the wider implications of its use. It’s just so odd that a specific term of sexual aggression has come into common parlance.

The person you’re responding do does little except troll all of kinja with racist as hell comments, with occasionally some heavy sexism thrown in for flavor. Trying to get them not to say “cuck” is probably a losing battle.

Nietzsche and Joseph agree, respectively. But for real, don't go around calling things 'cucks'. It makes people not take what you've got to say seriously because it sounds like it's coming from a kid or a Nazi. Like if someone went around saying every bad thing that happens is them getting 'raped'. It's not…

You may or may not be right. But most of those supporting the above policy changes run as “conservative Christian” candidates, or vote for them. In fact, a great many hold themselves up as model Christians, adherents to “God’s Law.”