“but they had no evidence of that and have been walking it back ever since.”

A fucking huge-arse aerospace company and defence contractor who’s trying to stem their haemorrhaging stock price after a series of high-profile screw-ups? Hmmm...

If you are having suicidal thoughts...

I’m simultaneously interested, but also think it’s a real bad idea. Black Mirror for me works because of the same reason the Twilight Zone works: they’re simple (or not-so-simple, whatever) concepts and we see a snippet of these strange worlds/dystopias and then it ends and it’s on to the next one. It lets your mind…

He wasn’t great. But I can’t really hold a 9 year old accountable for a bad performance. It’s not like he’s a professional who had spent decades honing his craft or dreaming about the project. Unlike the guy who wrote his part and directed his performance.

The prequel trilogy is as despised as it always was by the people that despised it. The difference is that the opinions of 8 year olds who loved the movie at the time didn’t count and now they’re in their 30s and are counted as part of the conversation. I would guess the number of adults who saw it in theaters and…

No, the prequels haven’t been “normalized” or redeemed. Showing them on regular cable a lot doesn’t make them better. Excusing them as “children’s films” or pointing out that Rise of Skywalker is worse doesn’t make them better or justify their low quality.

Back off, man, none of that was in the intentionally misleading headline.

I mean, this is a strained analogy, but if we want to frame it in that manner, it’s actually more like a striking worker returning to work after getting the better contract they struck for.

Or it is because 12 Years a Slave is an overall much better movie than Killers of the Flower Moon.

I’m curious about the card. Was it just a rewards card like Ralphs or something, or was it also a credit/rewards card? Their Risk acceptance is probably like 5K$ every six months or so, maybe more. Had she just used it normally, a couple hundred over 6 months would have probably went undiscovered and at least a slap on…

Every time I see people with this same bullshit take, I think that you either didn’t see Poor Things or you don’t understand how basic math works.

Oh fuck all the way off twice. Emma Stone did nothing wrong.

I saw both Poor Things and KOFM. Emma Stone is much more front and center in her movie and her performance is very showy. Lily Gladstone’s performance is much quieter and for me impactful. However, it isn’t hard to see why Stone took home the Oscar. Nobody got robbed of anything.

“Robbing” is a strong and inappropriate word. It would have been awesome to see Gladstone win because I really loved her performance, but Stone’s was also really incredible, and a much bigger part of her film. The award was up for grabs especially between the two of them, and not for Gladstone to lose.

Oppenheimer was an excellent long movie, that didn’t feel long.

Here comes the non-stop “Gladstone was snubbed” nonsense.   Just because she’s Native American and didn’t win doesn’t mean she was “snubbed.”  She doesn’t carry the entire film by herself the way Stone does in Poor Things and the only true snub would have been Stone not winning.  Gladstone gave a great performance but…

That would be stupid “fail safe”. Retreiving or launching your boat on your boatramp? Sorry, there is weight pulling the car backwards, so we will just kill the motors.

Statham should be the big bad Henchman, Cavill is the new Bond. Hugh Grant could be M or the main villain (why not both?). Moneypenny, Q, etc should just play by the same actor like the previous Bond.

She deserves some kind of punishment for her failures and role in this tragedy.