Aside from all the problems everyone has highlighted, the front, profile, and back belong to three different cars.

Rear end was known to be glass, much like the first year of the CTS-V, rear ends were known to not live up.

The paint color/texture doesn’t even match.

I can’t decide if this blacked out model looks better or like an unfinished prototype:

I have a couple of suggestions (all from the 2000s) if you don’t already have these cars on your list:

What? Please elaborate. I’m curious.

The quality on the post-2003 Corolla was pretty good. And it looked like a mini-me Lexus on the inside. The 2009 Corolla though; that’s when things became dingy.

You’re boring. We get it.

It has the same general proportions as the Lincoln MKT.

Holy shit, this just looks like a fucking subway train at this point:

Yaawwn. Wake me up when these supercar companies start making something that is even remotely unique.

The penis is a beautiful organ. I don’t know why Americans are so horrified by the sight of one.

If someone says Prius, I swear to God I’m going to bust a tit.

I keep hearing about how terrible the Dart is, but nobody really goes into specifics about what exactly makes this car so terrible.

I never thought I’d see the day when we’d be uttering ‘Smart’ and ‘Lotus’ in the same sentence, but here we are. I think not incorporating the safety cell as a design element was a missed opportunity, as it could have worked really well.

That’s one of the most ho-hum cars released in the last 20 years. Why do you want that?

Can’t we swim down there and scavenge for parts?

I am totally going to Internet-buy this, but my only concern is that poor little 3-cylinder.

It looks like a 15-year-old Impreza:

Disagree