I guess racism isn’t racism if the Gawkerati agrees with what is being said?
I guess racism isn’t racism if the Gawkerati agrees with what is being said?
These weren’t taken out of context. Stop handwaiving this away. Several of her tweets were just belligerent, idiotic racist screeds.
If ever there was an article that exemplified millenial self loathing libtard trash, this is it. This just reaffirms my belief of “Its only racist if a white person does it”
“The tweets were not racist; they were jokes about white people, which is a different thing that is not racism.”
I expect no less from the NYT.
This paragraph alone is such utter bullshit. It’s as if some uneducated preschooler has no idea what racism is and doesn’t know how it doesn’t need systematic oppression as a lead up to still be racism. This conveniently provides the accusers with a free pass to be racist themselves under the guise of false logic…
I call bullshit. If there was someone out there saying we should #cancelblackpeople. That person would (rightfully so) be called a racist. This woman is a racist, and we can’t have a double standard if we want to truly advance race relations in this country. All treating white people like shit does is create more…
You could have saved everyone a lot of trouble by just saying it doesn’t count if its white people. Racist jokes are racist no matter who is saying them. Fuck your bullshit about it not being racist because she doesn’t do racist stuff. This kind of bullshit propagates and normalizes racism just as much as anything…
This entire article is nothing but rationalization. Fuck that. Jeong should go. The NYT is way past its prime. What utter bullshit. The upside is I don;’t have to read this discredited bullshit website anymore since it is such self-absorbed tripe. You ought to be ashamed of yourselves for continuing the negativity.
You and everyone else here pretty much are just making excuses. The same excuses that you lambaste the other side for doing. So much hypocrisy.
It shows your complete ignorance of racism to assert that this woman isn’t a racist. If she were white she’d be wearing a hood. That the left parses racism and implies that being racist towards whites is perfectly ok, is in itself racist. The Times will ultimately resend her offer, because they know she’s a racist…
Hating 👏🏾a 👏🏾race 👏🏾is 👏🏾racist 👏🏾even 👏🏾if 👏🏾it’s 👏🏾the 👏🏾race 👏🏾YOU 👏🏾happen 👏🏾to 👏🏾hate.👏🏾
Nope, I’m pretty sure those are racist jokes, they’re just acceptable racist jokes.
“Making jokes about white people isn’t the same as making racist jokes about black people, or Asian people, or Jews, or gay people, or any other historically oppressed minority”
Typica leftist. Incapable of rational thought. If you say something racist, you’re saying something racist. You don’t have to have a set…
Nah, racist jokes against white people are still racist. They just don’t come with all that extra baggage of making a joke out of oppression. Maybe in the future, take a different stance.
The NYT thinks politeness is letting the bullies run free, but screaming if the victims raise their voices. The WP is the same. Others? They really root for the bullies, hoping they’ll either profit or delay being hit next.
“You’re free to have a civil discussion, outside my restaurant, without any of my food. You’re welcome.”
Yes, and their daughter can just stay inside her ostentatious Manhattan apartment and be quiet, too.
Is it worth my time to undermine a highly funded large group of people who enter their field of study with preconceived notions about how the climate works?
This attack piece is “intellectually dishonest” and only proves his point. The “climate change” inquisition is ridiculous.