she seems nice.
she seems nice.
not to be a stickler but this doesn’t look like it comports with the well-recognized rules of jousting.
On Feb. 4, police charged Morgan with misdemeanor reckless use of a firearm.
definitely a clean block. i feel like the ref told him he was wrong sort of like how you appease someone just to get them to shut up, without really meaning what you’re saying. “yeah, i’m wrong, feel better? go away now.”
only human to feel that way. but then that other human feeling of realizing that your son has to atone for what he was alleged to have done has to override that. coach screwed up by not reporting it, bottom line.
not a johnny supporter in the least.
that’s aggressive. i have seen restraining orders such as the one issued here be sealed and destroyed years later after they were litigated and determined unsupported. but ok, i can tell you’re really passionate and likely know a lot about this.
can one be considered uninformed when he encourages others to wait until the facts are known before passing judgment? ok.
thanks for the lesson, sport.
dude. i get it. all i am saying is we, society in general, should keep that principle in mind when drawing conclusions about people we don’t have a fucking clue about. this particular story piqued my interest because there has been one, unrebutted affidavit filed by the petitioner, and conclusions are immediately…
i was busy drawing stussy signs on my binder when OJ was in trial.
high school dropout and please forward me your contact information at your earliest convenience.
who said innocent until proven guilty?
you didn’t say “anything ever”, so let’s try this again. one misd. conviction for failing to identify means he is likely guilty of assaulting this woman in the manner that she described above, based on the affidavit that same woman has filed.
not jumping to his defense. jumping into people’s comments who hear one side of a story and pass judgment on what happened while being comically uninformed.
so one minor conviction over five years means that he has automatically done anything anyone accuses him of, right?
i think so, can you clarify just in case?
the guy has one misdemeanor for failing to identify himself to a police officer and all of a sudden he’s a career criminal.
guilty until proven innocent.
you must know him pretty well.