The title said better. The article talks about cheaper. I made the point that two dont neccesarily equate. You get snarky.

This article actually means cheaper, rather than better, which was in the title. Two very different things.

I think that's a bit extreme. First, it assumes that when you're done with your car, it is not still being used (ie "wasted"), when that is almost surely not the case, and it is being sold to someone who is more ... frugal.

do you want a new car every few years? lease