Wouldn’t any awareness of the rules or ability to follow the rules inherently mean the model also knows how to break the rules? How is a language model going to avoid saying bigoted things if the model can’t recognize (and thus be capable of recreating) bigoted speech?

Have you visited Metacritic or Rotten Tomatoes, my hot-take-loving friend? Have you seen the practically UNPRECEDENTED reviews from hundreds of critics and thousands of fans, mostly all agreeing the show is phenomenal? Murder porn is not a financially lucrative genre to spin such an expensive tv show around. I get…

I suppose we see what we want to see. I still feel like she was a badass and that what they have been doing is trying to up the level of fear felt for the infected over certain scenes in the show (both Joel and Tess seem MUCH more apprehensive about running into infected than in the game). The way she handled herself…

Yes... The *horrific* imagery in this *horror* show was, in fact, quite *horrific*.

Where in the PlayStation games she was a confident, dynamic character, HBO makes Tess an example

I see absolutely no problem at all with WotC taking the IP that they own and saying: “Hey, feel free to use our IP and even make money on it. But if you make three quarters of a million dollars or more, we’d like a cut. Otherwise, feel free to use our IP free of charge so long as you let us know.”

I NEED CCTV video of this happening, because it was probably amazing.

I appreciate that people want to be paid a lot of money to waste everyone’s time doing repetitive art until they get close to a good idea; I, too, would love to get paid to come up with random ideas until someone hears one that they like.

AI image generation is in its infancy. Many legal questions need to be resolved. Dismissing its value as a potential tool because artists need to eat is short sighted. I bet you aren’t a fan of the assembly line, either.

AI art is actuallly great, people who create it using prompts are artists and automation is just a natural part of civililization and technolology.

AI isn’t going away. In fact, I suspect we’re going to see technology advance so rapidly in the next 5 years that it’ll make the internet boom look like the Jurassic period.

Why? Because we’re training the computers to do our learning for us now. Technology used to be limited by human limitations.

Computers can do it…

And to those people, I say: “Come on, really? Come on.”

We now have indisputable confirmation that a media giant suppressed the truth because it could harm the democratic party, and Giz’s main commentary is “Who cares, the files are booo-ring.” I’m astounded at the vapidity. Fucking astounded.

According to Stanford (per the LA Times and other outlets), the alleged sexual assault was “an unwanted kiss.” That seems like pertinent info, particularly where the linked article never mentions “rape.”

I mean the whole rest of the word salad is about that. I think it’s valid to ask about the cultural underpinnings that produce someone insular enough to not think through the consequences of pouring hot coffee on someone on the one hand but who’s mental health is so fragile that the manifestation of those consequences…

Very, very sad when anyone takes their own life let alone a young person.  However, I don’t believe for a second the letter from Stanford caused her to take her life.  She obviously had other major mental health issues going on.

Being subjected to a review process when you do something like pour hot coffee on another individual isn’t exactly some great unknown, low probability event.

I’ll start off by saying that I know nothing whatsoever of the particulars of this case other than what I read here.