dougdoug2--disqus
dougdoug2
dougdoug2--disqus

No, because he changes the lyrics and makes something entirely new. This is just putzing around with someone else's work.

Here's the litmus test: film yourself or your friends, or people in their mid-forties as Jagger and Bowie were at the time of this video, attempting quick, dextrous dance moves the way the aforementioned are, and notice the difference in energy and creativity.The video's muted audio actually displays an aspect of the

Because two aging rock stars doing a cover of 60's song that meant a great deal to both of them is comparable to sending a nation to war over false intel.

No, it's that this video is meant to take these artists down a peg, or at least lower them ever so slightly to the level of celebrity-hating, trivia-addict internet nobodies, which, given both artists overall body of work, it ultimately fails to do. That's my argument.

But everybody seems to miss the point that it is a mere pebble of a gaffe in the careers of two incredibly successful titans of music, both of whom could care less if some sad internet jockeys tool around with it for their own pathetic pleasure. Therefore the reedit of some nearly forgotten thing from nearly thirty

That's because you possess no special powers, Col., except to waste your life on this comment board.

Those high nielsens must have been mass hypnosis. Yeah, that's it…

Funny; they still look like incredibly fit, incredibly wealthy rock stars having a blast, and the edit still looks like the work of jealous losers. Am sure Jagger and Bowie are deeply hurt…

When I was an intern at SNL in 2000, they actually did a parody of the VH-1 'what if John and Paul hung out in '70s' movie, with Fallon as Lennon and Alan Cumming as Paul (they open a fried chicken restaurant together - "A-one, two, three, four…four orders of chicken to go!")

The AV finding another excuse to take cheap shots at a reliably funny and successful late night host?
Noooooo!!!

Well, he was there…

Yeah, it's a rough version, with a time code running on the bottom of the screen through out.

The bootleg Director's Cut is even better - more stuff on the Cavern, how intrusive Yoko was during the White Album, etc. Sometimes you can find it on Ebay.

Let's Be Natural.

Typical scene: The other three, circa 1965, watching George spend hours trying to piece together a simple solo in the studio, saying to eachother, "you think this guy will be worth a three-hour documentary in forty years?"

Zep just show-off, adolescent dick-swatting on blues music, each member competing to see who can make the loudest, most pointless 'look at me' musical gesture (Plant acrobatically shrieking or absentmindedly cooing on the ballads; Page's endless, directionless solos; Bonham's Neanderthal anvil-like tone -whatever the

Yeah, it's only based on listening to their music, not the usual 'Zep too much for you to grasp' hype. Can see why you lemmings are offended.

You read well.

Wow, Robert Smigel should sue these guys for ripping off his old 'fun with real audio' bit from SNL.

Patricia Bosworth's bio on Clift is must reading for anyone interested in this founder of modern acting. Dave Franco is a remarkable lookalike; give him about ten or twenty more dramatic roles and he might be the ideal candidate for a Monty biopic.