@cinnamonster: I totally laughed out loud at that.

@33rd°: she's now a zombie??

@Dr Emilio Lizardo: "But if China were to invade the US would the EU sit and watch?"

@bluehinter: MathNet!!!

@trs: omg.. totally agree!

@Lex Luthor II: just the radiation. an actual nuclear explosion is a feat that requires careful engineering.

@dougdirac: I was gonna say that first image looks a lot like the MiG 31 from Firefox.

Wow

@kaffenated: Well as an American speaking English, I don't think the rules are that complicated. Nominative versus Objective.

@kaffenated: "whom are"??

"Still, let's grant for the sake of argument that preons exist, and at sufficiently ludicrous densities it's possible to form preon matter and, in turn, a preon star. These stars would still have diameters greater than four or so miles long - anything less and a black hole would have to form. Preon stars would pack…

"That means that it's impossible to see an object that's simultaneously blue and yellow or red and green. I'm not talking about what happens when you mix those colors and then look at them - obviously, you'd get green and a sort of murky brown if you did that. "

@dougdirac:

I'd rather have this. Looks a lot like the original lightcycles and it's electric. Just needs some electroluminescent accents.

@beaker: that photo is clearly fake

@Burke: this thread is hilarious

@tophermyers: as @jetRink says, as is, they'd conflict with each other. But that problem could be solved with time division multiplexing.

@sephycloneno15: No, I got that it was in different languages. I just think that's it's probably easier to make some prediction about plate tectonics on geological times scales than it is to predict the evolution of languages on geological time scales!

@sephycloneno15: For that matter, how did they know what language to give the numbers in.

@Roklimber: I guess in case someone is wondering: