Yes, you can fault someone for what happens after that if she revoked her consent. Do you not believe marital rape is possible either?

She also literally said no just before they put their clothes back on... after which he started trying to take them off again. Wow, so unclear right?

You’re on a roll. Keep it up. You’re doing the name of Hermione well.

Maybe you need to get out more instead of being here trolling.

I think it’s all related to your last question. To me, the particular body parts to be conjoined are irrelevant, what matters is that both partners make an effort to agree on conjoining them, and conveying that mutually.

She went to his place after dinner. That is literally consent.

I hope you never let the cable repair person in your house. They might think you want bone. Going to someone’s apartment after a date isn’t consent.

You had me up to the last. Sorry, but no. Going back to his apartment isn’t consent: it’s an action by itself. Assuming anything else is just asinine.

The fact that he repeatedly made sexual advances after being asked to stop, including following a woman around his apartment and repeatedly continuing after she asked him not too, both verbally and non-verbally. But cute attempt at implying I’m racist.

You’re welcome to disagree with anything you want, flat-earthers exist and there are mountains of scientific evidence that prove them wrong.

So when she repeatedly asked him to stop and removed her hand from where he put it on his genitals, that was her revoking consent. So he’s still predatory and gross.

By going “back to his place” the only thing you’re consenting to is going into his home.

Nope, that is not literally consent. That is a miscommunication. He assumed consent, she did not affirm consent.

We’re expected to simultaneously believe that men are the arbiters of all logic, reason, and leadership ability while also understanding that men are dumb idiot babies who can’t understand or recognize obvious discomfort or the basic idea that “if you have to persuade someone to do something, they don’t want to do it.”

That is literally consent.

How is Aziz not a predator? Because he has as squeaky little voice?

On verbal and non-verbal communication:

“And to suggest that sticking your fingers down a woman’s throat on the first hookup is unexpected - please get out more.”

Um...what?

Going to someone’s place does not mean you consent to any and all sexual acts following your arrival there, and this idea is damaging as fuck.

If you consent to vaginal sex but not to anal sex, but someone has anal sex with you anyway, when you didn’t consent to it, would you say “Oh but I went back to their place so…

“to suggest that sticking your fingers down a woman’s throat on the first hookup is unexpected - please get out more.”