dorothyparkour
dorothyparkour
dorothyparkour

Thank you, grandma. No matter how it turns out, at least someone's looking out for the girls.

I used to work in a strip club/adult store/massage parlor. We had internet booths, with some free porn access. Every. fucking. week, random middle-aged, well-dressed, white guy in a suit would scuttle out of his booth like he had a red hot potato jammed up his ass and scoot out of the store and almost without

Everything she wore in Auntie Mame too. Flawless.

I promise not to write an excel spreadsheet of all the times you didn't give me the sexin' I want and send it to your work email.

Are you really angry at me because you think kids should be allowed to ruin everyone's day when they don't get a shitty Burger King Pie?

Reading your question, I feel that what is being implied here is that all women are for sale at some price. Not the case. Sorry.

What you do all day, and the people you interact with, invade your imagination and color the world. When your customers view you as an object and a commodity, it's likely to be hard to shake that off when you're not working. It's going to color your view of men and your feelings about sex. When sex becomes the thing

I’m still waiting for them to film the best Christian love story ever told. The Love Story of Michele and Marcus Bachmann. It’s an endearing and emotional love story of a wild, free-spirited gay man and a stern driven woman. Together they fight the evil liberals and seductive gay culture. Their love and passion

Which is precisely the problem (particularly in rape culture) - the idea that we, as bystanders, can determine how traumatized a victim is, or should be. Which then leads to the idea that you can "tell" who's the "real" victim and who isn't, by the way they act, or something. I can't agree that the more severe

The law is complete a red herring in this instance. Dawkins wasn't talking about the law, but instead trying to illustrate basic logic using a stupidly controversial example. Determining the severity of a crime to determine punishment is one thing. Determining the severity of a crime in order tell victims of it

You are correct, it's not an endorsement. And yet it's still an arbitrary value judgement that has not real correlation over which is "worse."

If they really want to shock us they should take a picture of how much it costs to make these things compared to the retail price.

There's a collective action problem involving center right and center left voters when it comes to creating a coalition that does not include shas or an ultra orthodox group. That's why you have settlements. The problem is not something that can be solved by just "getting out to vote".

What bothers me is that insinuating that Hillary is a lesbian would be considered an insult.

Calling Hillary Clinton a lesbian is shitty and tired and unfunny, but I'm not about this "women can never rag on each other" thing. I agree that women can be too competitive and each other's harshest critics, and we should stop making fun of each other's bodies and stuff, but that doesn't mean we can never make fun

I believe we're framing this all wrong. To appeal to Republicans, we should stop calling them "child refugees" and start referring to them as "post-term fetuses fleeing countries with insufficient abortion clinic laws and regulations."

Re: Argument 1 - I agree. It is a false equivalency. The thing is, there doesn't have to be an equal and opposite scenario specific to men - women are women, we birth babies, and protection from pregnancy is VITAL to our health and our ability to live our lives (a problem you men don't have to the extent we do). You,

Black girl here. For years I dated a guy who was also not white, but I didn't know until we'd been together for a while that he was not really that okay with black people in general. He viewed me as somehow exceptional, and it made me sick inside to know that he felt that black people had to prove themselves to him,