“cuck beta leftists.” I swear to god, you could not sound more desperate to seem cool as right-wing edgelords do when they string these words together.

Sounds to me like Arch Warhammer is a dick.

Why in the hell does a big fucking company like SONY need to crowdfund a goddamn thing?

Put your "own" levels up? Seriously? You ripped this stage off from another person and take credit as your own? What kind of person are you? As a journalist you should be ashamed of yourself. Plagiarism IS actually a thing ya know.

your own levels? ok buddy

Is unseen work the part where you steal other peoples work and claim it as your own?

Except it's not your level, mate, you nicked it off of the user JoshLamm

Yeah, stealing Mario Makers concepts from other people and passing it as your own. Lots of fun :)

Yes you do need a bell if you ride like most do. Oh wait why warn people in the crosswalk while you are running a red light, easier act like they are at fault.

Have you bought a new car lately? Is there one feature your new car has that is entirely useless to you?

Except he was told

Sorry friend but it sounds like you have an agenda against the guy. I have read multiple reports and not a single one said people told him it was illegal before he did it.

what he did sucked, but I mean its not like he did it on purpose.

Can we just not give this guy the attention he apparently so badly craves?

Drivers and Police get grumpy with them because they (cyclists) only follow the laws of traffic when it suits them. Run a red light or stop sign, no problem i’m a bike i can do it. Cross multiple lanes of traffic at once, “it’s ok i’m on a bike”. Ride between the lines of cars stopped in heavy traffic or at alight,…

You know, there's a whole article underneath the headline that you're also supposed to read.

Nah, she’s a criminal. It doesn’t matter how much you hate her victims.

A lot of rich people lost money on her, and that just can’t stand.

I’ll take that bet. She’s going away for a long time.

Not exactly. We need to apply Bayes’ Theorem here. But that’s not possible unless we know whether “95% accurate” means “it misidentifies you 5% of the time” or “it fails to identify you at all 5% of the time” (false positives and false negatives change the likelihood differently).