*Yawn*
*Yawn*
Nope, just luck and fucking the poor over. It's the only way. I heard it at this very website.
Yeah, great message. No one who’s ever found success has gotten there through hard work.
I’m just left stunned, wondering where the *noun* is at the end of that sentence.
Yeah, exactly. I fail to see how this furthers the cause or highlights the struggles of women at all. “raging out of control narcissism” aptly describes it, as stymie 99 said.
“By holding mirrors, we hope to suggest that women are a reflection and embodiment of nature, the sun, the sky and the land.”
Gandhi better get his shit together this time. The wolf in sheep’s clothing gimmick won’t work on me anymore. Dick.
It would be a nice goodwill gesture to apply the money people paid for Civilization: B.E. towards the purchase price of Civ VI.
I know you’re just a kid trolling for attention, but I will make one point in response. Categorically dismissing ideas as “wrong” (without even lifting a brain cell to say why) isn’t the principled stand you seem to think it is. It’s straight up intellectual laziness. THAT is why Fox News’ ethos can be…
How the hell do you actually watch them use it.
You want playable female soldiers in a game set in the 1910s?
Please take a high school physics class.
No, Fox bombed last summer with Fan4stic 4.
That is not the hoverboard I personally want.....too high. This is the hoverboard I want. A nice safe 6 inches off the ground.
I came here unclear about the concept of free speech. After reading your well worded and thoughtful rebuttal to the original comment, I feel like I have a firm grasp on it now.
The fact that this reply has more than quadruple the stars of the original post is almost enough to scare me off of Gawker comments forever.
Instead of attacking someone without presenting a good argument as any good pinko fuck would do why don’t enlighten us with the definition of free speech. Or is it I say what I want and everyone stfu?
No... he isn’t.
Your definition of “Well private companies have every right to censor people” only works when it’s in your favor. Take net neutrality for example, under your definition, shouldn’t Comcast be able to block sites for AT&T? Should they be able to say “Well, we don’t support Sanders, so any pro-Sanders sites we’ll just…