If the DNC required sanders to wear a muzzle during the debates, Hillary supporters would claim “We held the debates, what are you whining about?”

Yes, because no democrats or progressives on gawker media have advocated violence or rioting...heheh.

Well, by hook or by crook, right?

No, sanders switched his party affiliation in November, which was simply a “documentation" function. Before that he was simply an undocumented democrat...heheh.

I have no doubt the Hillary flying monkeys will delete any comment that doesn’t conform to the Borg collective consciousness.

“Look, they’re going to support the path that leads to a win.”

Oh bullshit. Sanders publicly declared his intention to run on the democrat ticket on April 30. It doesn’t matter when he officially joined the party, it was paperwork shuffling.

No. The DNC by their governing documents are required to remain neutral to all candidates and each must be treated fairly.

Except they cheated in doing so.

Because the “leaders” of the party are not supposed to be choosing the nominee.

Well, unless he was cheated out of the nomination.

Sanders publicly declared his candidacy on April 30, 2015.

They thought Hillary was the most likely outcome in 2008.

So, you don’t think a major political party, whose constitution requires them to be nuetral during the primary process, working to give an advantage to one candidate over all others is something to be concerned about?

It’s also that they poll everyone and don’t zoom in on likely voters, which is more factual.

Almost every state poll I've seen doesn't include all four candidates which invalidates them. Clinton loses 1-5% to trump when all candidates are listed.

Well, if the election were held today, which it isn’t.

Whistle much?

Last weeks NBC poll that included all four candidates had Clinton up by one.

Last week while gawker was crowing about the Clinton +12% ABC poll, NBC had one with all four candidates and Hillary was up only by 1. You never heard about that one....why?