“Serious and direct”, huh. That’s one way to describe Zach’s, um, “quirkyness”. I think most writers/reporters have a tough time describing his behavior because they know he has touch (or more) of something personality-wise, and wisely tip-toe around it.

Hate to share this with you, but you steal confidential or top secret material you don’t get a back rub and a pat on the head.

Cheslea Manning is not a “Whistleblower.”

Chelsea Manning is a *Traitor.*

Somebody needs to put Bryan Cox and Joey Porter on the same staff together. I’d pay more for webcasts of their meetings than I would to go to a game.

This article just proves the problem with society. You write the half truth and uneducated people take it as the full truth. I paid capital gains tax on my investments so that must mean that I am paying a“ lower rate on that than you are, even though you fucking work for your money.” The problem with this is that I…

“I Call On All Civilized Nations To Join Us In Seeking To End This Infinitely Scrolling Blog Disaster”

It also means he got drunk once and cheated on his wife.

Rectum?................It damn near killed him

muy grave el recto

The craziest part of their conspiracy theory? That one person is responsible for all the animations in a AAA game.

This world is fucking stupid now.

Yes, but it’s a term they use with the utmost respect.

No that’s his brother from Pearls Jam.

De-A-th is how you spell “death”, Tony. Can I call you Tony, my deer boy?

Megadeth.

Imagine Salem Media converting all their sites into operatives seeking to take down a Democrat ruler like Obama or Hillary. How far away would the shrieks of outrage be heard - Pluto, the next galaxy over or the far side of the Universe?

Front end was contained and yet the back still went for the nearest grouping of bystanders

I try to be a good,non-violent person..... but that is one PUNCHABLE face

If you think “Sit back, relax and enjoy” could kinda’ sorta’ allude to rape, you must see rape allusions everywhere.

I get why clickbait isn't acceptable to use for some sorts of criticisms, but how do you figure it's not acceptable to use in the case of a misleading headline designed to make people think that a fairly mundane article is not mundane? I take it to mean the same thing. You may not like that it carries with it a much…