"People often assume their cars are submersibles" Seriously? People think that? um, maybe they just underestimate the depth of the water? I'm thinking that's a bit more realistic. It's certainly very dangerous to drive into flood waters, but I've never met anyone who though their car was also a submarine.

What an awesome idea, totally doing this next time I'm at a "you eat too much" restaurant.

Are you suggesting that because the constitution is old, we should ignore it? That whole "free press" thing was written well before the internet, do we scrap it and write something new?

Has it already been pulled or is it not available yet? I'm not finding it on the app store.

Well, a car has one purpose, transport, just like a gun has one purpose, shoot. Or, a car has multiple purposes, take the kids to school, go to work... and a gun has multiple purposes. hunting, target, home defense... With the exception of private sale, I believe a drivers license (though I suppose "some form of…

Just curious, is this article suggesting we should give up our 2nd amendment rights or the internet? Same argument about drunk drivers and cars. Do we stop selling cars because people drive drunk?