Hmm, I was expecting Dietrich von Bern (Theoderich in other languages i believe), Faust, Siegfried, Hagen von Tronje (Hagen from the Ring of the Niebelung), Attila, Jeanne D'Arc, Ragnar Lodbrog, Barbarossa, King Lionheart, Laurin, Beowulf, Charlemagne, D'artagnan and other old characters. Yes I know that Beowulf and…

You're not serious, right? It's a difference like night and day. The game that is, in 3D, most like it's 2D incarnations is Prince of Persia, and that is still different.

And with the perspective the gameplay has been changed.

I liked Metroid when it was a Metroidvania, after it became a shooter (on a console!) i lost interest.

I fail to see a reason why he would have wanted that in the book...

I use my ps2 controller. But the only time I use it is when I play emulations (and rogue legacy), don't see a reason to play other games with an inferior control scheme...

He wanted to tell what Gandalf did. That doesn't mean he found the book lacking. Can't explain it more simple than that.

Either that we have to evolve more, or that we need to learn more, depending if colonization of space is possible. Evolving to be more conscious about how we exploit earth, without endangering us (not the planet, that is preposterous after all), learning more to be able to colonize other planets, after which it…

Just because other stuff happens in the world doesn't mean that he found his book lacking...

Nope. If he thought they were lacking, he would've rereleased the books. He simply was addicted to this world of his, and kept on writing.

So Tolkien fans don't care for good story telling? Granted, they're Tolkien fans, so one knows they aren't crazy for it, but i can't imagine a whole fandom liking crap story telling.

You realize that there are 2 men, father and son. It's not one man who has hallucinations, it's a drinking father and his son who fantasizes..

I argue that stuff like this would make Star Trek way better. Just look at the problems Star Trek has: Ridiculously stupid stories, a mish-mash of boring stuff and cringe inducing, bad action, and logic holes the size of a borg cube. All these come from mixing SCIENCE fiction with action willy-nilly. But if they would…

Fail safe yes. But I wouldn't call a mechanism to cut people in pieces before smashing them to bits a failsafe. But the whole thing is futile, star trek is clearly unscientific, so scientific discussions about it are just... futile. Can be fun though, so go nuts.

The bowl shaped plates are for soup, fyi. And I never understood why people put cooking utensils in the dishwasher. One pot takes the place of 4 or 5 plates, and if it is clean after the dish washer, you could've cleaned it by swishing water around in it.

Yeah, after all it is impossible to just use less water than with hand washing. Really, where would humanity be without smart alecks?

Maybe your dishwasher needs a connection to the water line? You're putting in cleaner, right? If you don't tell us more, we can't tell you why you have to rinse everything...

Ok, I just saw the first episode, and I think it's not good. It's Relic Hunter, not Indiana Jones. And the case of the week was not interesting enough for me. Does that change?

I see a difference between being reminded, or thinking about something, and hearing, but sure...

I thought Destiny was grindy, boring, cheesy crap? Not trying to provoke, but I thought that was the consensus, and it's played because people play grindy stuff... But I don't really know anything about it, I don't think I know anyone who has a console of the current generation.