yep that's my thoughts too.Nothing wrong with the mythology and indeed, the idea that the conspiracy was finally coming to fruition was a great idea, but you got to invest in it. You got to make it the focal point. My own thoughts would be to have based the 6 eps on Mulder continuing his investigations on his own…

The biggest mistake they made was not choosing what kind of show they were going to make. You can do MOTW or you can do mythology but, with only 6 eps, you can't do both. To then go and try shoehorn in a complete retcon of 9 seasons of mythology and you have a recipe for disaster.

yep you did just prove my point. well done you.

the point is there are already examples of where 'blood doesn't always have to have blood' and Lexa is the one to do it for the other reasons cited.

But Lexa is growing as a person through her relationship with skaikru and their influence. She also a better idea and willingness to play the long game than her grounder peers. Then there was her decision last season to pull back from going to war with the Mountain Men. So while it's rushed, it still makes sense.

The complaints about Bellamy are wrong, I think. Firstly, Bellamy has always, underneath everything, been a follower in search of a Leader. Yes he has been thrust into leadership positions at various times but he is always comfortable following someone else, Clarke, Kane, now Pike. He was never a good leader,…

Haven't read the book but I'm very excited about this. My hunch is that the point of the story isn't so much about stopping JFK's assassination but the meta point of how historical events happen, are remembered and then subsequently (re)constructed to be passed on to the next generation.

cool story bro but it's the internet and the av club at that not the royal literary society of anal retentive grammar nazis.

your reading comprehension is not my problem, go back to night school or something.

his criticism is just barely hidden resentment that he is reviewing the show and s po faced as to be absurd and consistently so. nothing ot do with fanboys or anything.

you would though. It was alright for what it was.

I liked the montage of insane zombie slaying but I would not like to see it used again. The flashbacks as Jessie and her family died were well executed. They showed the surreal nature of the trauma pretty on Rick pretty well.

obvious troll is obvious. just ignore him.

Look, they didn't teach him to shoot. They showed him some basics to try get on his good side. They were very aware about not giving him a gun. He got the gun when it fell on the ground. No plot hole, no inconsistency, nothing. Just another hater not paying attention.

you don't really understand the nature of fire and the human body if you think that. The fire would burn out before a handful would catch. It wouldn't be powerful enough to immoblise any of them.

you're talking about 10,000 walkers… in a stone quarry… without a tanker full of gasoline (probably more than one) you're not going to make more than a camp fire. Fire has been shown not to destroy the walkers, especially limited fire. So no a fire wouldn't have sorted the quarry situation out.

1) cos they didn't have a tanker full of gas at the time

they didn't arm Ron.He picked up the gun Carl dropped.They specifically avoided letting him have a gun and live ammunition. They didn't teach him to shoot, they just showed hi some basics. If they had taught him to shoot properly Carl would be dead

ye there are a lot of haterz and a lot of trolling in the comments this week. It's very weird.

this is just contrarianism for the sake of it. If your reaction to 'anyone can die' is to not give a shit then the odds that you would ever give a shit is pretty low imo.