donnabaggiani--disqus
DonnaBaggiani
donnabaggiani--disqus

lmao I was hoping that comment about how it got dark was sarcasm.

you're not alone. Everyone with brains thinks this reviewer is bonkers.

Lots and lots of trolling this week. full moon?

I'm sorry but if you agree with this reviewer on anything I can't take you serious. He is that terrible and absurd.

some things die hard. lol

This is where fleshing out the Wolves would have benefited more. But it was obvious the wolves had some kind of zealous belief in the dog eat dog nature of the post zombie apocalypse world and the only right choice is to embrace it and go feral. It seems they did like to preach this and this was what the Wolf wsa

There's nothing high minded about it. He's just po faced and obnoxious.

probably because they didn't have tanker full of gasoline to sustain a fire long enough to work. Also the ep where Daryl meets the runaways they tell him they started a big fire that killed a lot of walkers. so it has been addressed before.

At this stage the reviewer really needs to stop reviewing the show. He adds nothing to the discussion, gives the impression he isn't even paying attention and is laughably po faced which wouldn't be so bad if he wasn't obviously deluded as to the intellectual validity of his critique. Your boredom, personal resentment

These shows are pointless and vacuous. That means in order to be relevant they have to become the TV equivalent of clickbait. They actually detract from the impact of the show. See the debacle around the Glen cliffhanger in The Walking Dead from a few months ago.

Isn't every Danny McBride character basically a variation of Kenny Powers?

you're entitled to your view as much as I am entitled to say its nonsense and you're an idiot. Restating your original point for the 3rd time doesn't really do anything.

we already knew Clarke didn't want to kill Lexa, at least if you were paying attention.

Clarke was never going to kill Lexa. The scene was just pointless and contrived.

Lexa didn't flinch cos Lexa is a badass. Clarke knows this it's why she is in love with her. So if that was Clarke attempting to 'show agency', it was pretty stupid. and Clarke 'showing agency' could have been done in much better ways. That's why it was horribly contrived. Your take really doesn't dispute this its

The Clarke holding a knife to lexa scene was really contrived for me. There was no way she was going to do it. Firstly, she had no reason to side with the Ice prince. Secondly, it's been clear all along her anger with Lexa is not 'she betrayed me now I need revenge' but 'she broke my heart how can I live with myself'

I'm fairly sure thats just the OPA tattoo.

that scene was gratuitous and, ultimately, superfluous rather than enlightening. I'm sure they were deal with this at some stage in the next few eps probably something t do with the baby. However, my point is that they really should have dealt with it in the first ep rather than the really bizarre, weird and

This was great. The one criticism I would have is that the opening flashback seemed superfluous. We didnt learn anything that we didn't know except for the fact that Julie's father was the big bad which we would have learned later in the ep anyway. There also seemed to be a lot of unnecessary and irritating

yes I know the original was a mix of motw and mythology. however my problem is that Mulder and Scully being back in the FBI, on the X Files no less, no questions asked, is weird and I can't get my head around it. It doesn't follow from how the show ended. The opening ep just made it more bizarro for me. I hope they